Is that with or without the high heels?I should be fine I think, Iām 6ft 2
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is that with or without the high heels?I should be fine I think, Iām 6ft 2
Most people become good at their job (some change professions and get good again), learn a sport reasonably well, get good at a game or hobby, etc. We have the capacity to become good at more than one thing.Nonsense.
A person has only a set amount of time on this earth. They can give time to learning one thing well, or divide that time between multiple things, learning each less well. They are free to choose how they wish to divide their time.
Hence the old but accurate saying, "Jack of all trades, master of none."
I'm not telling anyone how to decide or what to learn. I am saying what the results are going to be.
You could learn one art kind of well, and master another art. Or you could learn a bunch of arts pretty well, and one art poorly. Or a few arts well, a few arts pretty well, and a dozen other arts a little. I mean, possibilities are literally endless.You can also learn one martial arts poorly and many martial arts well.
Just wanted to rephrase the italicized portion slightly. Doing Sumo does help me get better at BJJ. (There are areas where the skills overlap.) It just doesn't help my BJJ as much as if I spent that same time practicing actual BJJ.Going back to my own training - one of my secondary arts I practice is Sumo. I won't pretend for a moment that I am good at Sumo. (Although I have a lot of fun with it anyway.) It doesn't make my BJJ significantly better. However it does help me become a better martial artist. There are certain mental and physical attributes that I consider to be relative weakness of mine from a martial standpoint. Sumo forces me to develop those attributes to a higher level.
I can think of several people in my family who have mastered multiple musical instruments. Heck, My son plays the drums and the the bass guitar very well, and is pretty good on a six string. He also plays the melodica a little, just for fun. Heās also an outstanding artist, and does many other things very well. And heās not even 30 yet.You could learn one art kind of well, and master another art. Or you could learn a bunch of arts pretty well, and one art poorly. Or a few arts well, a few arts pretty well, and a dozen other arts a little. I mean, possibilities are literally endless.
I think we can all agree that there is always more to learn. And yet the limitation remains self imposed.Can you do multiple martial arts at the same time? Yes. Can you learn multiple martial arts at the same time? Depends on what you mean by learn. If it's just to learn the techniques, yes, but will still be somewhat confusing for the body to get comfortable with and sort out possibly conflicting principles. I can imagine the difficulty one would have trying to learn two foreign languages at the same time. Some with a special aptitude may be able to do so, especially when young, but for most of us it would be quite a challenge.
As Gerry said, to really get into the particular art, one must delve deeper and explore, and that takes time. But I'll go a little further here, beyond background and culture, into the art itself. To truly learn, it's best to immerse oneself into the subject. To excel in French and really get comfortably and creatively conversant in it, and understand the nuances, sense of humor and irony, it's best to live in France for a year or two. To live, eat, breathe and use it on a daily basis. For it to become natural. In other words, one must become French.
To me, such immersion is necessary to internalize and absorb the essence of the subject, whether language or MA. Once the subject is internalized and has become an integral part of you, the skill is set and solidified. Then, I think it will be no problem to start learning something new.
Yes, for two reasons I mentioned: 1. Kids brains are hot wired to pick up language. 2. They are immersed in the language using it every day in real life situations.Multilingual children in houses where multiple languages are spoken become fluent in both languages. And there are many benefits to it. It seems hard because you have not tried it.
French cooking.Well to anyone that sees thisā¦ thank you very much for all your replies I found them very helpfulā¦ I have decided not to start TKD, but am still on the look out for a possible 2nd art for when I get to a decent belt in karate (I will carry on karate as well as the other art)ā¦. Any suggestions on what is a good style to add to karate???
What's in a trade?Hence the old but accurate saying, "Jack of all trades, master of none."
I'm not telling anyone how to decide or what to learn. I am saying what the results are going to be.
I think we can all agree that there is always more to learn. And yet the limitation remains self imposed.
Multilingual children in houses where multiple languages are spoken become fluent in both languages. And there are many benefits to it. It seems hard because you have not tried it.
Multilingualism: Multiple Benefits
Multilanguage learners (MLLs) are children learning two (or more) languages at the same time. Multilingualism has multiple benefits.www.zerotothree.org
Not even about exceptional or stupid. Childrens minds have an affinity for new languages that is lost as we age.Oh yeah. They are not exceptional we are stupid.
Yes, for two reasons I mentioned: 1. Kids brains are hot wired to pick up language. 2. They are immersed in the language using it every day in real life situations.
I believe the critical period hypothesis is pretty well supported by research and has been since at least since I was in college. (Although recent research may indicate that it lasts longer than previously thought - https://news.mit.edu/2018/cognitive-scientists-define-critical-period-learning-language-0501 )Is that true, or is that something you just believe to be true because it sounds hard?
I believe the critical period hypothesis is pretty well supported by research and has been since at least since I was in college. (Although recent research may indicate that it lasts longer than previously thought - Cognitive scientists define critical period for learning language )
That's not to say someone can't become fluent in multiple languages as an adult. It just takes a lot more work.
I can't remember if it was here or elsewhere that I read someone's comment that the hardest language to learn* is your second one - because you're not only learning the language: you're learning how to learn languages and after that subsequent languages will come easier.Can you do multiple martial arts at the same time? Yes. Can you learn multiple martial arts at the same time? Depends on what you mean by learn. If it's just to learn the techniques, yes, but will still be somewhat confusing for the body to get comfortable with and sort out possibly conflicting principles. I can imagine the difficulty one would have trying to learn two foreign languages at the same time. Some with a special aptitude may be able to do so, especially when young, but for most of us it would be quite a challenge.
As Gerry said, to really get into the particular art, one must delve deeper and explore, and that takes time. But I'll go a little further here, beyond background and culture, into the art itself. To truly learn, it's best to immerse oneself into the subject. To excel in French and really get comfortably and creatively conversant in it, and understand the nuances, sense of humor and irony, it's best to live in France for a year or two. To live, eat, breathe and use it on a daily basis. For it to become natural. In other words, one must become French.
To me, such immersion is necessary to internalize and absorb the essence of the subject, whether language or MA. Once the subject is internalized and has become an integral part of you, the skill is set and solidified. Then, I think it will be no problem to start learning something new.
Okay. Sure. But you're still missing the point at hand. Stay with me for just a second. It's not about whether learning that second language is harder than learning the third language... or makes learning the third language easier. The issue here is a matter of scheduling... of synchronization. Does when you learn the third language matter?I can't remember if it was here or elsewhere that I read someone's comment that the hardest language to learn* is your second one - because you're not only learning the language: you're learning how to learn languages and after that subsequent languages will come easier.
*(As an adult, not counting languages you grow up learning from your environment.)
I can't speak to that from personal experience, but my martial arts experience would seem to support it.
In the beginning I was just learning basic kinesthetic awareness of my own body.
Then I was learning the principles and body mechanics of the first art I studied in depth.
Then when I started studying new arts I had a tendency to try carrying over the body mechanics from my first art. (In fairness, a lot of this was due to my arrogance and unwillingness to empty my cup rather than an inability to grasp the new system.)
Nowadays when I study a new art I'm pretty good at identifying the body mechanics and principles which distinguish that art and getting my body to follow those patterns. It still can take some time if they are significantly different from something I've practiced before - but it's a lot quicker than I was able to pick up my first art. This is partially because I've greatly improved my control of my own body and partially because I've greatly improved my ability to see and analyze what's in front of me.
I suspect that the limiting factor there is just time. At least with languages students will understand that each is its own thing and won't get caught up in debating whether it's better to conjugate a verb the French way or the Italian way.The actual question is whether it's harder to learn two languages/martial arts styles/other complex systems at the same time, than to learn one at a time? That's the question at hand.
I actually wasn't making an argument one way or another on that point. I was just relating my own personal experience in my martial arts training.Okay. Sure. But you're still missing the point at hand. Stay with me for just a second. It's not about whether learning that second language is harder than learning the third language... or makes learning the third language easier. The issue here is a matter of scheduling... of synchronization. Does when you learn the third language matter?
Said another way, let's agree that learning the second language makes learning the third language easier. The question is, does it have to be sequential... learn language 2, and then learn language 3? Or can it be simultaneous? And the answer seems to be that folks experience the same benefits of learning that second language when learning multiple languages at once as when learning them in series.