hoshin1600
Senior Master
- Joined
- May 16, 2014
- Messages
- 3,220
- Reaction score
- 1,747
i am not sure how to respond to your post. i believe your last post is meant as a history lesson to make a point. to answer your question directly yes there are some things that are not quite right but i dont think they are important enough to the topic at hand. while i made a few comments on your prior posts, my main concern was not understanding your post to begin with and this one didnt help me understand any more. im sorry.I now ask you a question.
Is any of this history in error?
you typed this in both posts "Te" -> Tang development cycle. " and this " "Te" -> "Tong" development or hybrid." im sorry i am not understanding the intent and meaning of what you are trying to say. you also posted "In Japan the "Te" -> Tang = new "Te" development cycle froze"
what is a development cycle, what froze and what is the meaning of the -> sign???
my only other reply to you was about this
notice you use the word "students" with and S ....this sentence to me (and maybe it just me and im wrong here) has the meaning that it was a common practice for all "the Okinawan masters" to teach their students for a period on 6 years then send them to China to study more.The Okinawan Masters would send their top students to China after about six years of training in the Okinawan system
if this was your intent in what you wrote then i disagree.. on the other hand many Okinawans did go to China, and did learn there. its common knowledge that they did. including Matsumura Sokon.
Did you mean that the Okinawan's studied with the Chinese? or did you intend your statement to only be about Matsumura? i read is as it reads and interperted it as it reads.