or the wrestler could slip on the ground and hit his head and pass out...there are so many variables to take into account during a "fight" there's no clean way to settle this
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The point of a style vs style is not to reach a conclusion on who would win. It is to see people's points of view and what they think. There is nothing wrong with debating on stuff like this. It only becomes stupid when it turns into a heated argument and personal attacks start. Martial Talk doesn't seem to have that many immature people who would turn something like this into a big argument (unlike Martial Arts Planet Forum).bignick said:i swear...there needs to be a rule about posting a "art vs. art" question...they go nowhere...they always start the same....
"if someone from art A fought someone from art B....and they were equally skilled...who'd win?....i'm gonna say art A...(cause that's what i do, believe it or not)"
search around and you'll find plenty of these threads and they never accomplish anything...unless the original point of the post was to start a verbal fight...
who'd win? who knows? who cares?...when i was a white belt in judo and jujitsu...i would do groundwork with a guy that wrestled for 15 years...had a black belt in jujitsu and a brown in judo...most of the time he'd kill me...wouldn't even know what hit me...but every once and a while...he'd slip up and i'd get a choke or a good pin and i'd win...i remember one time he left himself open for a rear naked choke and i slapped it on so fast he tapped out like that...does that mean that all white belts in judo and jujitsu can beat all wrestlers and black belts in jujitsu?
The problem I feel is that it treats these arts as one dimensional...BJJer's would dominate on the ground, but wrestlers could destroy them standing up...and both arts are more complex than that and it's a disservice to simplify them so.Cobra said:Consider both of there strenghts. Wrestlers obviosly dominate standing up, but BJJ has ground domination. If a BJJ guy gets the wrestler down, it can be all over for the wrestler despite he has wrestled on the ground, but only to turn him over. But if the wrestler can keep from being tooken to the ground, then the BJJ guy wil be in trouble. So who do you think would win?
CrushingFist said:Sports don't ...work in the streets or actual situation
does it?
Sports are entertainment
BTW. Boxing, and Muay Thai (you train in both) are sports, and no one in their right mind would question their real life combat effectiveness....CrushingFist said:Sports don't ...work in the streets or actual situation
does it?
Sports are entertainment
Ditto what Mike said. Ignorance is death...MJS said:Nobody wants to roll around in the street, but I can assure you that it would be wise to have the knowledge on how to get back to your feet.
Mike
Not nesecarily with the advent of no gi Jiu Jitsu. It depends on the men, and the attributes of the men as well. Skill, and attributes (endurance, flexibility, balance, timming, strength, coordination, visual/spacial acuity, speed, killer instinct/will to survive, ect.) are both importaint. Having balance in both skill and attributes are vital. See my above post about how MR. Strebent effortlessly made me his "girlfriend" on the mat.Bod said:If you are comparing equal skill levels then the BJJ man would win against the wrestler if they are wearing more clothing. The wrestler would win if they were wearing less clothing.
.