- Joined
- Aug 3, 2015
- Messages
- 14,847
- Reaction score
- 6,409
Not sure what that has to do with you answering the question. The question can still be answered regardless of if you believe it or not.Anecdotal evidence is the best evidence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure what that has to do with you answering the question. The question can still be answered regardless of if you believe it or not.Anecdotal evidence is the best evidence.
Don't worry about Hanzou's nonsense. I used to show proof of the techniques that I claimed to be able to do by showing videos and Hanzou still talked nonsense after the videos. Even if I sparred with Hanzou and showed him personally, he would still be on the MMA band wagon.It's still a single event. That's weak evidence, and JGW's reply was reasonable, though less documented.
In this case the source is the person who was an active participant in the sparring.I thought even anecdotes were to have a source. That is what makes them not stories.
Not sure what that has to do with you answering the question. The question can still be answered regardless of if you believe it or not.
Where did I say i took down an MMA fighter?We have zero evidence of you taking down a MMA fighter the way you described.
Where did I say i took down an MMA fighter?
From post #89
"It's doesn't say anything about the system and a lot about Sherif Bey. I have no where near 30 years of experience, and I have sparred against an Amateur MMA fighter and I wasn't rattled nor was I knocked out. So what does that say about Hung Ga? That I didn't get knocked out?"
As for evidence. I don't need to have you validate what I've done. As for me going to gym to knock out an MMA fighter, just to prove a point to you? Really? Me going to a MMA gym for the purpose of knocking someone out simply because you don't think Hung Ga doesn't stands a chance against MMA?
In this case the source is the person who was an active participant in the sparring.
Every story has a source. The point I made previously about this is that we have to evaluate the source. If it's someone who commonly makes unsupported claims, the anecdotal evidence carries less weight. If it is someone (like JGW) who doesn't typically make unsupported claims and who we have seen videos of him doing something similar to what he describes (sparring with someone outside his style), then it carries more weight. If we have video to complement the anecdote (as we do for Hanzou's), then even better.I thought even anecdotes were to have a source. That is what makes them not stories.
Actually, it's a reasonable counter argument to a single-fight statistic. Hanzou pointed to a single instance and asked what that said about the art. JGW responded, essentially saying what I heard as "Not much, no more than me doing well against an MMA fighter does. It says more about the person in the fight." Not really an outrageous claim, rather pointing out that using a single individual isn't a good way to judge an art. It seems clear both are making a valid point.Not really. You sparred some mma guy isn't really very good in terms of supporting an argument.
why not? Bey sparred some mma guy? Why does his experience of who he spars counts but the experience of who I spar doesn't?Not really. You sparred some mma guy isn't really very good in terms of supporting an argument.
Every system has some guy with "30 years of experience" who hasn't learned how to apply his techniques in free sparring against another style. This is a Jow Ga guy who claims 30 years of martial arts experience. If we were to base the effectiveness of Jow Ga on his performance then my sparring videos would look like this. For me personally, I would have been more than happy to unleashed a wide range of Jow Ga techniques on this guy just for being a flashy sparring opponent.Actually, it's a reasonable counter argument to a single-fight statistic. Hanzou pointed to a single instance and asked what that said about the art. JGW responded, essentially saying what I heard as "Not much, no more than me doing well against an MMA fighter does. It says more about the person in the fight." Not really an outrageous claim, rather pointing out that using a single individual isn't a good way to judge an art. It seems clear both are making a valid point.
Actually, it's a reasonable counter argument to a single-fight statistic. Hanzou pointed to a single instance and asked what that said about the art. JGW responded, essentially saying what I heard as "Not much, no more than me doing well against an MMA fighter does. It says more about the person in the fight." Not really an outrageous claim, rather pointing out that using a single individual isn't a good way to judge an art. It seems clear both are making a valid point.
As I said, I think you have a valid point. The bigger issue is that there's not sufficient evidence of Hung Gar being used to be able to say Bey's performance isn't representative. If a Gracie black belt gets his *** handed to him in competition and looks weak in the process, we have other examples to see that this is not representative of GJJ, nor of BJJ in general. Unfortunately, we don't have sufficient evidence in either direction on Hung Gar to determine if it's a weakness in the system or not. It may well be.Well the difference is that up until that point Bey was considered an authority on Hung Gar in the US, also we simply don't have a lot of examples of Hung Gar exponents participating in fights. It would be no different if Rickson Gracie got whopped on in a challenge match in the early 90s, or if Royce got beat down in the first match of the first UFC and none of his brothers or anyone else stepped up to counter that rather public defeat. Those losses would paint their style in a rather unfavorable light, just like what happened with Bey and Hung Gar.
It doesn't help that Bey's video also supports a general narrative, so while it is a single video, that video is part of a pattern of various confrontations that has been occurring for the better part of two decades.
What happened to Bey is akin to what would happen if some random clown came in off the street and beat down Shawn Williams, a prominent black belt under Renzo Gracie, or Rener Gracie. Again, Bey has been prominent in NYC martial arts and Kung Fu circles for decades, and he has made a career out of supposedly making HG a practical form of fighting that can stand up to MMA. Those claims were obliterated by that video, because the MMA guy he fought against was an amateur fighter at best, and Bey is considered a master (if not grandmaster) of his style.
As for JGW, we don't even know if JGW is telling us the truth. That's the problem with his story, and it's a problem that he could fix rather easily.
There's enough you tube video evidence of Hung Ga practitioners sparring to show that Bey's performance isn't the representative of Hung Ga. I'll put this way, we don't need to find an expert Hung Ga Sifu to show more Hung Ga skill than Bey showed in that matchThe bigger issue is that there's not sufficient evidence of Hung Gar being used to be able to say Bey's performance isn't representative
There's an update to this one. I haven't been KO'd yet that's priority #1 lol. I did say that I haven't been taken down yet, but a few months ago that kind of changed. I was working with the other instructor and helping him with his sparring and he got me with a sweep. I'm not sure how to classify that since it was a light sparring situation where I was giving him opportunities to do techniques, but none the less that sweep got me and he did it with perfect timing for a close range sweep. I didn't fly up in the air (I'm so glad of that), but I do remember my feet coming together and then it went blank and the next thing I was doing was laying on ground with my fists clinched screaming "Noooooooo." lol.just that he didn't get KO'd and I think he said he didn't get taken down, though I may be misremembering that part
why not? Bey sparred some mma guy? Why does his experience of who he spars counts but the experience of who I spar doesn't?
Why would you need to challenge someone to come up with evidence? No one challenge me to come up with evidence to prove that the Muay Thai practitioner that I sparred with was actually my brother. No one here challenged me to come up with evidence that I'm the fight instructor at my school. No one here challenged me to come up with evidence that I practice legitimate Jow Ga kung fu. No one has challenged me about my experience in fighting. No one has challenged me about if I ever did sparring with someone from Sanda or Taekwondo. What's bigger than that is that no one has challenged me on the question if I can actually fight or not.We can challenge him to come up with evidence. We can legitimately suggest that a one off has its limitations.
I don't even know what this means. People who do the real thing don't bother with "show me evidence" because they have enough fight experience to and knowledge, to where they can watch a person sparring and get a good idea what's that person is capable of and what they definitely aren't capable of.This is the foundation of why crap martial arts is crap. Because someone who is doing the real thing can't compete with someone who has a good sales pitch.
Why would you need to challenge someone to come up with evidence? No one challenge me to come up with evidence to prove that the Muay Thai practitioner that I sparred with was actually my brother. No one here challenged me to come up with evidence that I'm the fight instructor at my school. No one here challenged me to come up with evidence that I practice legitimate Jow Ga kung fu. No one has challenged me about my experience in fighting. No one has challenged me about if I ever did sparring with someone from Sanda or Taekwondo. What's bigger than that is that no one has challenged me on the question if I can actually fight or not.
So out of all the things in which would have verified me being full of crap I haven't been challenged on. In addition I've even shown videos of me doing bad in sparring and having bad days where the other instructor got the best of me. But when I say that I sparred with an amateur MMA fighter and I didn't get knocked out, my statements all of a sudden becomes unbelievable and comparable " I beat up ten hung gar guys this morning and six bjjer made one cry."
If you can't match what I say with what I've shown and determine if I'm telling a tall tale then I can't help you. That's a person problem. If you doubt my skills then that's cool too because I can't help you there unless you spar with me then you'll see first hand.
I don't even know what this means. People who do the real thing don't bother with "show me evidence" because they have enough fight experience to and knowledge, to where they can watch a person sparring and get a good idea what's that person is capable of and what they definitely aren't capable of.
One claim is consistent with past evidence. The other isn't.It can become unbelievable any time I want. What am i supposed to believe without evidence?
That is the issue. You leave it in my hands. Or worse the group just decides based on some sort of popularity contest. Or internal script.
So my statement of fighting 10 hung gar people is as valid as yours. True or not. And that is the basic problem.
One claim is consistent with past evidence. The other isn't.
One claim is consistent with past evidence. The other isn't.