OK the point is: the drills ,stances ,footwork used in modern systems are based on realistic tried and tested techniques.They are fluid and translate DIRECTLY into sparring movements.Theirs no hinting at ,no hiding,no exagerations and no BS.I've seen many a fight between traditional MAtists where once the contact starts all their precision and poise goes straight out the window and it turns into an embarrassing flurry of wild punches and kicks.Why? because their training methods didnt resemble actual combat.Marginal said:One of the problem with the perception of kata comes from not being able to seperate the technique from the training tool. For example, when someone says "If you get in a fight, you'll punch from the hip and get clobbered." They're missing the positives that punching motion in the kata introduces. Chambering at the hip etc all encourages you to keep your elbows in, even when you move to free sparring. You're not still punching from the hip then, but the exaggeration gets the principle across.
Same thing with stances. Do you fight from a static stance, or specifically from a horse stance etc in free fighting? Nope. Doesn't mean you don't hit on them while you're in motion even if it's briefly.
Even if you blithely discount those, it's about the same as discounting wrestling drills, NHB stances, boxing footwork etc. It doesn't make sense. The're all just the means to the end, not the end in of theselves. If you were losing in tournaments it wasn't because you weren't able to use the techniques, it's because you couldn't see the forest for the trees, and the people who could see the bigger picture excelled where you stagnated.
AND the reason I sometimes lost was symply because my opponents were more aggressive . The defensive techniques I had been taught were not effective enough to hold off someone whos really intent on knocking your head off.