- Joined
- Apr 18, 2002
- Messages
- 8,069
- Reaction score
- 25
I totally love these pictures. A few years ago, I embarrassed Tess in the National Museum of Art by looking at a piece by a supposed master and saying, "What is this piece of ****? I wouldn't hang it on my ****ing refrigerator." I was not whispering. So, one might say I am a harsh critic. I enjoy realism and pointilism. When one is looking at proportions, one must take into consideration the period of the piece, is it rubenesque, elizabethan, or even antebellum? These factors will determine perspective and proportion more so then linear equations. I remember in a class where we were being taught the "correct" way to draw a human body, "the shoulders are three head widths wide, and the height is seven head lengths." I have never met a human that meets these standards. If you notice, in two of Tess's pictures, the women are obviously dancers or showgirls. People of that profession are typically wider of hip, longer of leg, and more rounded of *** than the average. Corsets will also alter dimensions of waist to hip. What I really enjoy is the use of shadows to determine detail versus hard line. Most of the pieces I did in the past I was proudest of were compositions in shadow. I do not do color well.
I decided to post this because typically when asked, I do not go into great detail of my opionion past wow. I wanted to publically let Tess know how much I appreciate her work, and that I really do know and understand what I am looking at. Once again, tremendous job, honey!
I decided to post this because typically when asked, I do not go into great detail of my opionion past wow. I wanted to publically let Tess know how much I appreciate her work, and that I really do know and understand what I am looking at. Once again, tremendous job, honey!