Zero
Master Black Belt
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2006
- Messages
- 1,284
- Reaction score
- 297
I have seen a few members mention in threads their dependence on, or placing their dependence in, an SD tool/weapon such as a torch in SD or similar scenarios/altercations.
I am not questioning the ability of an SD torch such as a Surefire in momentarily blinding or distracting an aggressor but rather, what the actual value is of using the torch itself, such as a large maglite or Surefire defence torch, in a defensive or attacking response.
Obviously depending on the state or country or situation one is in, there will be times you will be precluded from carrying a handgun or a blade and so reliance on other SD tools/weapons may come in. But I am not sure if a torch, albeit a toughened one, in either a swinging motion or thrusting, is any more, or even as, effective as a good old direct punch to the jaw or say a knife hand strike to the throat or eye/soft tissue strike. In the altercations I have been in in the past that I could not flee from or reasonably diffuse (in the past where I placed reliance more on physical ability rather than situation awareness and avoidance) I have found swift fists have got me through.
I admit having checked out concerning situations with a baseball bat or large hunting knife in the past but what I am talking about is a street/SD scenario where these or a gun are not to hand. I just don't know if the knock-down or knock-out potential of the torch is any greater than a good punch. I admit the extra length and leverage/arc it gives but then this is not as direct as a straight punch or uppercut. There is also the additional problem of having the thing wrestled from you and used as a bludgeon if you are on the ground etc if faced by multiple aggressors.
Maybe again where, and I am not being sexist at all, merely recognising the general difference in size and strength, a female was confronted by a male, the torch may add the additional strike power or reach to be of advantage, I don't know.
We have knocked people out in both competition and on the street with fists, so why the need to tie up one good hand holding something or reaching for something that may not offer that much more power in the strike.
I personally am not knocking the SD torch but I am questioning it as an effective weapon and wonder if those with experience in this matter could put their honest and analytical views forward on this. Sure anything that can be turned to advantage in a confrontation should not be overlooked but I am not sure if all options are better than the limbs were have already been give, particularly if we have been training effectively in their martial use.
Thanks
I am not questioning the ability of an SD torch such as a Surefire in momentarily blinding or distracting an aggressor but rather, what the actual value is of using the torch itself, such as a large maglite or Surefire defence torch, in a defensive or attacking response.
Obviously depending on the state or country or situation one is in, there will be times you will be precluded from carrying a handgun or a blade and so reliance on other SD tools/weapons may come in. But I am not sure if a torch, albeit a toughened one, in either a swinging motion or thrusting, is any more, or even as, effective as a good old direct punch to the jaw or say a knife hand strike to the throat or eye/soft tissue strike. In the altercations I have been in in the past that I could not flee from or reasonably diffuse (in the past where I placed reliance more on physical ability rather than situation awareness and avoidance) I have found swift fists have got me through.
I admit having checked out concerning situations with a baseball bat or large hunting knife in the past but what I am talking about is a street/SD scenario where these or a gun are not to hand. I just don't know if the knock-down or knock-out potential of the torch is any greater than a good punch. I admit the extra length and leverage/arc it gives but then this is not as direct as a straight punch or uppercut. There is also the additional problem of having the thing wrestled from you and used as a bludgeon if you are on the ground etc if faced by multiple aggressors.
Maybe again where, and I am not being sexist at all, merely recognising the general difference in size and strength, a female was confronted by a male, the torch may add the additional strike power or reach to be of advantage, I don't know.
We have knocked people out in both competition and on the street with fists, so why the need to tie up one good hand holding something or reaching for something that may not offer that much more power in the strike.
I personally am not knocking the SD torch but I am questioning it as an effective weapon and wonder if those with experience in this matter could put their honest and analytical views forward on this. Sure anything that can be turned to advantage in a confrontation should not be overlooked but I am not sure if all options are better than the limbs were have already been give, particularly if we have been training effectively in their martial use.
Thanks