mograph
Master of Arts
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,889
- Reaction score
- 1,104
I kinda liked DOS. Direct access to what I needed.I still use DOS in IT
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I kinda liked DOS. Direct access to what I needed.I still use DOS in IT
In all honesty, if I could mimic my teacher’s technique, I’d be more than happy!Yep totally agree. Shu is crucial but many people do stay there and think that's all there is. Then people confuse the word "tradition" with the shu stage, and therefore disparage traditional martial artists saying they're "stuck in a dead ritual/art" or that "traditional arts aren't willing to evolve", but they've made the association that traditional means shu, not realising that's not the full spectrum and picture.
But yes I do agree that many (out of perhaps impatience or ego) too readily skip the important shu stage and decide too prematurely they wanna do their own thing.
I guess I was however saying there's so much more to explore in a tradition than simply trying to mimic, but embracing the whole and finding your own path. But it is a fine and delicate balance isn't it!
You beat me to it. I was thinking the same thing. The issue is probably more related to childhood games than martial arts.. I grew up dodging things as a kid from the games that I played..If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
Always referred to myself as anti-traditional. Until one day someone suggested that CMA is trash, and we should all fight in UFC. I then realized that I'm still far from anti-traditional.Always referred to myself as a traditionalist.
When I was a kid, we all like to play sword fighting. Your arm is the sword. if you can touch your arm on your opponent's body, he is out of the game. One kid loved to hold on a big fist with both hands, keep his arms straight, ran toward his opponent like a rhino. That was where I got my "rhino guard" idea.The issue is probably more related to childhood games than martial arts..
I enjoy some of the tradition of my primary art. I’m also one of the few instructors to challenge other of the traditions. I change parts I think don’t serve well, while keeping a lot of the traditional approaches, because they appeal to me.Are you a traditionalist?
Do you only practise one particular style of martial arts?
If so, do you think this helps or hinders your progress?
Are you saying no arts besides japanese and korean based arts have tradition? If so, that's incorrect.only japanese or korean martial arts are bound by tradiiton but now american kenpo karate
This is why reading The Book of Martial Power by Steven J. Pearlman is so important.Depending on your art, you don't have to train in different styles and try to learn different ways to do the same thing. To me, that is where "non-traditional" can be a hinderance. I have seen too many people train in multiple styles that had conflicting strategies and methods of delivery. For example, Wing Chun has a VERY different delivery system and strategy than Choy Li Fut. The two are not going to be compatible. But, on the surface someone might think that they could combine the long range of CLF with the short range of WC. It isn't until you really start to understand the body mechanics of the system that you realize it isn't going to work.
Can you expand on that thought?This is why reading The Book of Martial Power by Steven J. Pearlman is so important.
The book by Steven Pearlman addresses the underlying principles and mechanics of the human body and the martial arts. Once you recognize the underlying concepts it means you need not hop around, mixing and matching different parts from other arts. This book is worth its weight in gold to the martial artist who chooses to apply the lessons it shares.Can you expand on that thought?
I think visiting with different arts has a lot of value. Different arts often teach and/or use the same principles in different ways. Some of the biggest "light bulb moments" I've had were seeing how another art approached something found within my primary art.The book by Steven Pearlman addresses the underlying principles and mechanics of the human body and the martial arts. Once you recognize the underlying concepts it means you need not hop around, mixing and matching different parts from other arts. This book is worth its weight in gold to the martial artist who chooses to apply the lessons it shares.
One of the bigger mistakes I see in the martial arts is people encountering systems other than their own and immediately scrambling to point out weaknesses in the other art as justifications as to why their own art is superior.Being exposed to other arts also makes it easier to see weaknesses in one's primary art. Those weaknesses are often masked within the closed group of an art, because nearly everyone has them. Playing with people from another art can expose them pretty quickly.
Jow Ga makes more sense to me when it's used against other systems. Jow Ga vs Outside system = fast-paced learning of Jow Ga. Jow Ga vs Jow Ga = contaminated learning and confusionI think visiting with different arts has a lot of value. Different arts often teach and/or use the same principles in different ways. Some of the biggest "light bulb moments" I've had were seeing how another art approached something found within my primary art.
Being exposed to other arts also makes it easier to see weaknesses in one's primary art. Those weaknesses are often masked within the closed group of an art, because nearly everyone has them. Playing with people from another art can expose them pretty quickly.
I agree, but sometimes it doesn't even have to be other arts. Sometimes it can just be another school within the same art, which for one reason or another doesn't have the same weakness as the first school.I think visiting with different arts has a lot of value. Different arts often teach and/or use the same principles in different ways. Some of the biggest "light bulb moments" I've had were seeing how another art approached something found within my primary art.
Being exposed to other arts also makes it easier to see weaknesses in one's primary art. Those weaknesses are often masked within the closed group of an art, because nearly everyone has them. Playing with people from another art can expose them pretty quickly.
Yes, and this is the point of the bookI think visiting with different arts has a lot of value. Different arts often teach and/or use the same principles in different ways. Some of the biggest "light bulb moments" I've had were seeing how another art approached something found within my primary art.
Being exposed to other arts also makes it easier to see weaknesses in one's primary art. Those weaknesses are often masked within the closed group of an art, because nearly everyone has them. Playing with people from another art can expose them pretty quickly.