I do, thank you very much.
Huh. Coulda fooled me...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do, thank you very much.
Somehow Im not surprised.Huh. Coulda fooled me...
Somehow Im not surprised.
Im not one of those people who would come up with some weird relationship between firearms and animal dung.
I will have you know that I am quite knowledgable and I've got quite a background with firearms, do you?Well, it's like most of the things you post: you don't know **** about it.
I will have you know that I am quite knowledgable and I've got quite a background with firearms, do you?
so in one post you admit they are used "sometimes" and then still claim they dont use them? Well if you have actually "known AND spoken" someone who are we to say anythingMaybe the Glock is sometimes used but from what I know in most branches and with most servicemen, they don't use striker fired handguns including Glocks, its a safety issue. I've known and spoken with many people who have served or are currently serving in the US Military.
And you thought I was referring to police officers and not military officers in my post back at 146....just
I will have you know that I'm the rightful Emperor of Fredonia!!
OK, what is the supposed "safety issue" of a striker fired handgun?Maybe the Glock is sometimes used but from what I know in most branches and with most servicemen, they don't use striker fired handguns including Glocks, its a safety issue. I've known and spoken with many people who have served or are currently serving in the US Military.
Sure they did, back in the 80s. Richard Marcinko's non-fiction books and the events he describes in them take place in the 80s and earlier. Do they still use revolvers today?Back to topic. Aparently the US Navy Seals is using S&W 686 revolvers(.357 mag) for some operations, because of its reliability when constantly being in and out of water. Several of Richard Marchinko non-fiction books feature Seals with stainless model 66 and 686 revolvers, for those interested.
What Im claiming is most of the time they still don't use them. The links provided by other posters talk about relatively recent events where Glocks have been approved for use by small specific groups in the military such as Marines special forces. I wasn't aware of those current changes but from what I've been told the vast majority of the people in the military still don't use Glocks on the job.so in one post you admit they are used "sometimes" and then still claim they dont use them? Well if you have actually "known AND spoken" someone who are we to say anything
And you thought I was referring to police officers and not military officers in my post back at 146
I will have you know that I am quite knowledgable
OK, what is the supposed "safety issue" of a striker fired handgun?
You do, perhaps, know that the Glock pistol was designed specifically to meet the requirements of an Austrian military contract?
The Glock only has one safety locater right in the trigger
Sure they did, back in the 80s. Richard Marcinko's non-fiction books and the events he describes in them take place in the 80s and earlier. Do they still use revolvers today?
The reference to Marcinko's book was for the pictures, if anyone was interested in that. The link I gave in the preceding sentence, which refered to current use, refers to weapons used by Seals today. I also found another reference to revolvers being used in some operations today in the list of modern seal weapons on navyseals.com with the following description:
"Smith & Wesson 686 .357. This is an excellent 7 shot revolver that is used primarily for Over The Beach or Dive Operations for its reliability in and out of the water."
Of course, as those sites appear to be civilian, I don't know how accurate or updated they are.
As for the Austrian military requirements those would be different.