I would say that they are practical. As practical as any other method is at times, whether it's a specific hand strike or kick. However, as with the rest, it's all conditional depending on times and circumstances.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
does ANYONE fall for the no touch knockout stuff?
:BSmeter:
Sorry if this has been mentioned, but I did not read all of the posts. IMO, just because the size of the pressure point is the size of a quarter, it does not mean I am going to strike with a weapon that is the size of a quarter. If you hit a PP with a large weapon it can still get the desired result. It does not mean that they are always going to be effective, no one technique is, but they can definately be an enhancement to a person's arsenal.
I have friends who are very good at using them effectively for strikes even under adrenal stress. For myself, I use them primarily to enhance and create openings in my grappling. They are the "poison on my arrow", meaning that I don't depend on them to win the fight, but rather to make my techniques more effective.
does ANYONE fall for the no touch knockout stuff?
:BSmeter:
does ANYONE fall for the no touch knockout stuff?
:BSmeter:
This is where the line can be blurred between adding pressure points to enhance your self defense and altering your self defense just to add pressure points which can get you in a lot of trouble.I REALLY enjoy the arts that teach students to hit various points in sequence during a fight.
This is where the line can be blurred between adding pressure points to enhance your self defense and altering your self defense just to add pressure points which can get you in a lot of trouble.
Cheers
Sam:asian:
does ANYONE fall for the no touch knockout stuff?
With the first paragraph, I couldn't agree more!!! Well said too.This is a very interesting thread. As has been stated we attack any vulnerable point. If we have a working knowledge of pressure points then that strike can be more effective, even if we don't hit the exact spot, if we land a strike in the immediate vicinity. If you train aikido or ju-jutsu you will recognise that many of the locks and manipulations actually are utilising pps even though they are not taught to the students as such. Knowing where the pp is can make a huge difference to the effectiveness of your technique.
As for the no touch knockout. It is not a practical thing for protection against attack but has anyone considered that it could be a training tool to demonstrate ki (or chi)? I train with a master who utilises ki and believe me it does work but it's a long learning process.
With the second paragraph: I disagree. I've met folks who'd said they could do this 'trick' and it never had an effect on me or my friends who also wanted to see it work. I'll just leave it to "I'll believe it when I feel it"....and I've already tried more than once, and I didn't. So for me, if something / someone can come and show me differenty, I chalk it up to a parlor-trick. A gimmick.