Steve
Mostly Harmless
Dear @Tez3 I'm actually quite glad to learn that you can still see when I dislike a post of yours, because surely that means you can see all of the times I "like" or "agree" with your posts, too (which is most of the time). In general, I think you're a force of nature, and a person I would quite like to meet (but understand the feeling isn't mutual). I think you're a terrific role model for kids, and I generally appreciate your stubborn, curmudgeonly nature.Sigh, I have you on ignore Steve but it seems I still have to see your 'dislike', I can't think why you would dislike it but for your information when you work in the public eye, have CCTV watching as well as the people you may have to arrest you'd better be polite and calm because things are going to go very badly for you if you don't. It's part of the training to stay calm, to be the one in control and most police officers I know, even if they are bricking it, can 'fake' that calm exterior needed to do a successful job.
As for being angry, I can only assume you are still angry at me for whatever you think I did. Please tell me what it was............ so I can do it again. Actually I'm joking, I still don't read your posts.
I "dislike" your post above, as I explain, because I think it's pretty mean spirited to intentionally escalate a situation and make people angry. Manipulating people like that is not okay, in my opinion, and it undermines your position to say that and then assert you are in control of your own emotions. Intentionally baiting or trolling people in real life is not the behavior I would expect to see from someone who is "in control."
But, and surely you of all people can appreciate the truth in this as you say it all the time, I'm not angry with you at all. It's easy to ascribe emotion to posts. You chastise others for doing it to you. I wish you'd reciprocate and stop doing so to others.