D
Deleted member 34973
Guest
Also, I will say this, just wanting the person out of the car, is not a viable excuse to yank out anyone. An explanation is needed, otherwise, it simply one human being assaulting another.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Brian,
Thank you for your very comprehensive reply! Some of the points you made were indeed brought up at the training, such as using fixed surfaces as pivot points for armbars. You are also quite right in the sheer number of factors to consider! I work law enforcement part time, and my jurisdiction (a military base) is quite small, and people are generally smart enough to not try anything with us. As a result, I have less practical experience than many civilian LEOs do... Especially around vehicles!
I feel you have a very biased attitude toward LEO. It would seem you have either had your own bad experience(s) with the law, really have no idea what you are talking about or what they do on a day to day basis.Maybe, but who determines "their own safety" I ask because this statement is very vague. I am not saying there are not reasons to do such a thing, but there literally hundreds of videos of people being yanked out, due to the fact that the Officer present, is just pissed at a person for exercising a right.
This is why an explanation is required. And, the very reason why some officers have been ambushed and killed.
People are just getting tired of these tactics, they really cause more harm than good.
One more thing, these officers put themselves in these situations. They are not necessarily put into them. Don't make it sound like that is the officers fault. You do remember the motto on the side of most patrol cars don't you? To Protect & Serve. That says it all.
Things have got to change and I think they are. More corrupt police are being jailed, more often than not these days and that is a good thing.
Maybe, but who determines "their own safety" I ask because this statement is very vague. I am not saying there are not reasons to do such a thing, but there literally hundreds of videos of people being yanked out, due to the fact that the Officer present, is just pissed at a person for exercising a right.
This is why an explanation is required. And, the very reason why some officers have been ambushed and killed.
People are just getting tired of these tactics, they really cause more harm than good.
One more thing, these officers put themselves in these situations. They are not necessarily put into them.
Things have got to change and I think they are. More corrupt police are being jailed, more often than not these days and that is a good thing.
I feel you have a very biased attitude toward LEO. It would seem you have either had your own bad experience(s) with the law, really have no idea what you are talking about or what they do on a day to day basis.
I have seen some of the videos you mention. The majority of them do not give the viewer enough information to understand what is going on. Most of them don't even have sound so who are we to conclude what is going on? As with most things in life, a few bad cops have made it very hard for the millions of officers worldwide to do their job. Don't forget a very large portion of the people they deal with are involved in violent crimes.
Agree. It is history.Not sure this is politics.
This thread has made me realize, that it is imperative, to train people to defend themselves against these types of techniques.
I'm curious, so I will ask. What specifically are you going to train people to do to defend themselves from these kinds of techniques?
Regards
I am unable to comment, on this post due to the fact that my responses are seen as negative, and then marked as political.I'm curious, so I will ask. What specifically are you going to train people to do to defend themselves from these kinds of techniques?
Regards
It is true that I personally have no use for them, that is not because of a bad experience, I just do not support their ideology.
if a store steals from me
Again, I can not answer questions from this thread, as my answers are seen and will be seen as political.I assume, given the context, that you are saying you have no need for the police.
So that would mean that if your car was stolen, you'd just say "meh" and write it off without calling the police?
Or if you or a loved one were assaulted, you'd not bother calling the police because hey, these things happen?
Or myriad other crimes against you or someone else, you'd just ignore it because the ideology of having a police force is something you disagree with?
Huh? What now?
I've never seen a supermarket walk into someone's house and remove stuff, or pick their pockets. How do you define a store stealing from you?