Yup.
Ive met a few ppl that self train and learned from videos. Yes they might look good, they might understand the technique, they maybe honorable and respectful.....but when it comes down to it they're a fake BB.
If you (the general you) know what you're looking at, you'd be able to pick out the video trained or those trained by someone who picked something up but didn't really practice the art it came from. It always comes down to small details that cannot be picked up from video learning or from learning from someone who simply learned a lot of tricks for his repertoire but never practiced the arts from which those tricks came.
I was taught a couple of iai kata by a former instructor. He never claimed to hold rank in iaido (he is a kendo guy), but he had picked it up and was sharing it with some of us for fun. I learned ipponme and a friend videoed me performing it. I posted it in the Japanese sword section because I was curious as to what feedback I would get from iaidoka. I got quite a bit of good feedback.
I now train at a koryu kenjutsu/iaijutsu dojo and looking at the old video, I can find even more wrong with it. Given that I had no formal iai training at the time, it looked pretty good. But if I were passing myself off as an iai master, anyone who has six months of iai under their obi could have picked it apart.
Lack of formal training shows up in technique. No way to avoid it. Which is why I found it odd that you would not judge the veracity of an instructor based in part on his or her technique.
From my understanding, ppl that self trained back in the days (lets say 1800's early 1900's) would go out and prove themselves. Not postin videos on Youtube about self defens!
And just what is your understanding of people 'self training' in the nineteenth and early twentieth century? Do you have names for any of these self trained luminaries? I ask because in the time period you mention, the technical content of most arts was not well known or readily learned without an instructor unless you were talking about fisticuffs and wrestling, which have been part of western culture for centuries.
And yes Im thinkin about someone in particular. LOL!!! There's this guy on Youtube (and Ive been lookin for the damn video to post it) that has a school and is a 6th dan in TKD ( probably a 7th or 8th by now)
Ranked with whom?
and he was younger then me.
And how old are you?
When I asked him who trained him come to find out that he bought his **** online!
If he bought rank, that would indicate a person of dubious character, which would fall under the category of behavior or code of honor. You are judging him based in part on this, which falls in line with Nadia's comment.
If he trained online (video training essentially), then that indicates a flawed foundation in his technique, which also falls in line with Nadia's comment.
Based on your response to my question, I'd gather that we think along similar lines, though I am not overly motivated to call out the fakes.
The general public is willingly ignorant with regards to the martial arts. Most will spend weeks and months researching a five hundred dollar television, but will do no research whatsoever prior to signing an MA contract that will cost them thousands. With the volume of information available, there simply is no excuse for that. If they cannot be bothered to gather basic information about the school, then I see no need to sound the alarm.
And I was lookin at his classes and what he was teachin and he was teachin crap to lil kids!
Crap in what way? Not saying you're wrong, but saying 'crap' could mean almost anything. Also, did you visit his school? Your header says that you live in DC. If the school is in this area (I'm not to far outside of DC), would you mind posting a link?
So yeah if you fake Ima say you fake.
Take this for what it's worth, but you would greatly enhance the quality of your posts if you would treat this as an internet forum and not as instant messaging or text messaging.