Folks are upset about a young girl's rendition of the National Anthem and it's causing a fuss to say the least.
[yt]4KVQUjxrgrM[/yt]
A lot better than Roseanne Barr's version I'll say that but it's not the traditional music. If written out note for note and compared to the original then one would see the differences (provided they can read music in the first place).
However I might be wrong in that as per:
Be sure to watch the Marvin Gaye version video shown at the bottom of the article.
Listen for yourself...An Indiana school district that told a black teenager to perform "The Star-Spangled Banner" in a "traditional way" after receiving complaints about her performance is drawing questions now about whether the complaints and directive were racially motivated.
Shai Warfield-Cross, 16, has performed the national anthem at sports events at Bloomington High School North over the last year without incident. But school officials said they received complaints about her performance during a game in Martinsville.
http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/st...d-girls-national-anthem-rendition-stirs-flap/
[yt]4KVQUjxrgrM[/yt]
A lot better than Roseanne Barr's version I'll say that but it's not the traditional music. If written out note for note and compared to the original then one would see the differences (provided they can read music in the first place).
So she was given a slap on the wrist (so to speak) and behaved herself the next time she performed.Some who complained after the game in Martinsville - a predominantly white community about 30 miles southwest of Indianapolis - also said they felt the rendition was disrespectful to current and former members of the military, Henderson said.
Warfield-Cross' family says athletics director Jen Hollars told the teen last Friday that she would not be allowed to sing the anthem unless she modified her version and sang in a more traditional way. "She was not told that she would no longer be allowed to perform," he said. "She was given guidelines that we hoped she would follow. She performed the next night using those guidelines and she sang beautifully."
Artistic expression is one thing, and performing for your own (and other's) pleasure is alright IMO. Yet taking a song which is the official anthem of a country and performing it (as it was written) in a public venue such as a sporting event, or whatever occasion normally calls for it, is something else.Aurora Marin, the teen's stepmother, told The Herald-Times that the directive denies Warfield-Cross her "rights of expression and individuality." The family has written a letter to school officials seeking an apology.
"The national anthem is a historical symbol for our country for independence. The irony is that Shai is being denied her right of artistic expression as a result of her natural voice and cultural heritage," they wrote.
However I might be wrong in that as per:
So what is the crux of this issue?Khalil Muhammad, an Indiana University history professor, said he listened to a version of the anthem sung by Warfield-Cross on YouTube and concluded it was "a fairly traditional rendition." He noted that many artists, including Jimi Hendrix, Marvin Gaye and Jose Feliciano, have put their own stamp on the song without significant controversy. Musicians have also performed the song using traditional Jewish musical styles, he added.
Be sure to watch the Marvin Gaye version video shown at the bottom of the article.