Tez3 said:We don't have to wait until they strike, that's a myth. The law here says that if you are in fear of your life you can strike first and you can use a weapon if you have something you can use.
This we can understand, and you are quite right. If myself and or one of my colleagues does feel a threat to our lives, we can strike. However in our experience, this depends on the type of copper that initially arrives on scene. Most that we have dealt with, are really quite level headed. However, some are pure and simply doorman haters. Now I offer no justification for that statement, you have to have done the job to comprehend that. So it is not just about the law, the human factor is intertwined with that.
Tez3 said:contrary to what many believe no one has ever been prosecuted in this country for legitimately defending themselves, the CPS even put out a statement proving this.
Yes you are correct, the criminal protection society would rather get the SIA to suspend licences and put doorman out of work. Thankfully, most derive a second income from door work. There are those though who have it as their primary income.
Tez3 said:My instructor is a head doorman in Newcastle and they do use traditional SD in fact they use TMA techniques to 'defend' themselves.
Could you please elaborate on what TMA techniques a doorman is allowed to use. My and my team, plus other colleagues, work as part of a SIA Approved Contractor. As a senior officer, it is part of my role to suggest new training or updates at our seniors meetings. We recently undertook the accredited close control and restraint updates as part of the SIA framework. Not really that good. If you have time, could you please list what you have alluded too. Perhaps they could be used in a training package or such like. Cheeky I know, but cheers anyway.