charyuop
Black Belt
I say immediately that due to my poor English it will be hard for me to say what I mean in this thread. But let me try to explain how it works for me.
Fluent and smooth form!
I am not gonna mention Chi factor, but marely what I consider fluent. When I say fluent I don't mean for the person looking at me doing the form to see no interruption of any sort. I have always felt that in a form (that is 24, 108 or whatever) there might be some points where you have, even if just a % of a second, a pause to go to the next posture.
When I mention fluent it is more an inner feeling. A feeling that tells me if I stop now it will break my form. As I said it is not a matter of Chi, but a matter of feeling inside of me the need not to stop in that moment to keep feeling the form smooth and fluent.
Now, assuming that my confusing discussion made sense to you, here's my question.
There are certain transiction parts that I was taught in a certain way, but if I do the way I was taught I feel a break in my form, I feel like it stop the fluency of my form. Just to make an example, in the 24 form I was taught at a ceratin point there is a Grasp the Sparrow's Tail on the left side followed by one on the right side. My Sifu taught me that in the transiction between the 2 I am supposed to withdarw my right leg, placing in the floor and go on to the next Grasp... That placing the foot down inside me creates a pause that breaks my inner fluency, so I tend to just withdraw the leg and instead of placing the foot down I go ahead stepping outside immediately.
Another example is the form in this webpage ( http://www.gilmanstudio.com/OnLine_Class/Lesson08.htm in the video is more clear, but I don't have it online sorry). After the push movement the transiction turns and come to a centered position to then open in the signle whip. Even in point I think that centering breaks the fluent motion inside me, so I tend to open to the single whip after the turning movement instead of coming to a full central position.
These are only a couple of example, but when is changing a transiction wrong for the form?
Fluent and smooth form!
I am not gonna mention Chi factor, but marely what I consider fluent. When I say fluent I don't mean for the person looking at me doing the form to see no interruption of any sort. I have always felt that in a form (that is 24, 108 or whatever) there might be some points where you have, even if just a % of a second, a pause to go to the next posture.
When I mention fluent it is more an inner feeling. A feeling that tells me if I stop now it will break my form. As I said it is not a matter of Chi, but a matter of feeling inside of me the need not to stop in that moment to keep feeling the form smooth and fluent.
Now, assuming that my confusing discussion made sense to you, here's my question.
There are certain transiction parts that I was taught in a certain way, but if I do the way I was taught I feel a break in my form, I feel like it stop the fluency of my form. Just to make an example, in the 24 form I was taught at a ceratin point there is a Grasp the Sparrow's Tail on the left side followed by one on the right side. My Sifu taught me that in the transiction between the 2 I am supposed to withdarw my right leg, placing in the floor and go on to the next Grasp... That placing the foot down inside me creates a pause that breaks my inner fluency, so I tend to just withdraw the leg and instead of placing the foot down I go ahead stepping outside immediately.
Another example is the form in this webpage ( http://www.gilmanstudio.com/OnLine_Class/Lesson08.htm in the video is more clear, but I don't have it online sorry). After the push movement the transiction turns and come to a centered position to then open in the signle whip. Even in point I think that centering breaks the fluent motion inside me, so I tend to open to the single whip after the turning movement instead of coming to a full central position.
These are only a couple of example, but when is changing a transiction wrong for the form?