HighKick
Master Black Belt
Without help from a very compliant partner, I agree.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Without help from a very compliant partner, I agree.
That arm twist was gentle. I've done similar techniques and when it's done at a faster speed and more aggressively it will "throw" the opponent. For me it was more of "pull my opponent into the ground." Here's what worked for me. The twist + forward + downward pull. Once I come out of the twist, I want to pull the arm in front of my opponent and at a downward angle. This keeps him from being able to step forward and from twisting out of it.Still on topic, here's someone winning a BJJ match with an aikido sankyo. We could argue that he only won because his opponent didn't know how to position himself to defend the lock, but the same could be said for the videos of aikido people losing to a single leg takedown so fine in my book
Sounds like the classic version:That arm twist was gentle. I've done similar techniques and when it's done at a faster speed and more aggressively it will "throw" the opponent. For me it was more of "pull my opponent into the ground." Here's what worked for me. The twist + forward + downward pull. Once I come out of the twist, I want to pull the arm in front of my opponent and at a downward angle. This keeps him from being able to step forward and from twisting out of it.
Kung Fu Wangs clip is a good example, but instead of the pull to the side, remain in front and then drag him into the ground. The pull is as if you are trying to pull the shoulder out of the socket. This is so your enemy cannot fight back. The risk of this is that some where in that process your sparring partner may become seriously injured. It just depends on how well that arm locks out. You'll know when you have it just right because of the tension of the arm as it cannot twist further vs then tension in the arm from someone trying to fight against the technique.
I probably wouldn't use it this way in sports. The day I used it was because someone grabbed me from behind and I unintentionally went into self defense mode . I don't use it sparring, since it can cause some damage to the ligaments to someone who may not be flexible.
The two are completely different. The Aikido version is done from a very different position.... he is upright, not bent over..... his body is behind the elbow.... his side is pushing his opponent off balance, so that he needs hi s other hand....he is not reaching for his opponent.... From the position the Aikido guy is in, he would not be able to turn his tiger mouth the other way. If more "control" is needed, he only needs to use the blade of his hand and forearm to cut through the elbow.... its very effective and very damaging to the elbow.
Not sue the purpose of Aikido joint locking is. IMO, the purpose is to control your opponent on the ground while remain standing.The two are completely different. The Aikido version is done from a very different position.... he is upright, not bent over..... his body is behind the elbow.... his side is pushing his opponent off balance, so that he needs hi s other hand....he is not reaching for his opponent.... From the position the Aikido guy is in, he would not be able to turn his tiger mouth the other way. If more "control" is needed, he only needs to use the blade of his hand and forearm to cut through the elbow.... its very effective and very damaging to the elbow.
I try to hit wrist locks and bit in BJJ. I arm wrench from a failed shoulder throw.Still on topic, here's someone winning a BJJ match with an aikido sankyo. We could argue that he only won because his opponent didn't know how to position himself to defend the lock, but the same could be said for the videos of aikido people losing to a single leg takedown so fine in my book
Almost, But this is closer to the position that I use. Imagine holding a sword that you quickly slash downward and as the blade falls you begin to pull your hands backwards towards your center. This way you are are creating force from driving downward and force from pulling.Sounds like the classic version:
If you wanted to be safe. You would do that from a 2 on one Russian. Because the whole arm is basically locked in. And you use your body to apply pressure.
Agree. A little forward hip motion and a sideway-down pull on his arm should land him flat, face down. Putting the left knee on the opponent's shoulder blade will keep him there for whatever you want to do with his arm. Simple and direct from the position shown.It would be better to bump him and allow him to fall on his face and then seize his back from this position. From here's there's no need to go into extra steps just to arrive at an arm lock. My personal thoughts is that the technique ends here. Anything after this point is to answer " what if I mess up he doesn't fall flat and tries to get up."
View attachment 32959
Why do you think that there is only one way to lock joints? There are many. Aikido does things their way, as each other art does things their own way. If you want to have your body between the other guys elbow and waist, while he is bent over, so that you can use your body to keep him off balance and remain close to him.... the Aikido way puts you in a good position to do that. In fact, his entire body is positioned to destroy that elbow.... without bending over and without over reaching.Not sue the purpose of Aikido joint locking is. IMO, the purpose is to control your opponent on the ground while remain standing.