ATTENTION ALL USERS:
Please return to the topic, and please keep the discussion polite and respectful.
jks9199
Sr. Moderator
Please return to the topic, and please keep the discussion polite and respectful.
jks9199
Sr. Moderator
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The introduction of karate to the public schools required significant changes to the way in which it was taught. In order to accommodate large numbers of novices, the traditional, one on one, instruction model had to be abandoned. In its place was a new training paradigm modeled after European military gymnastic drills. The practice of kata as the central focus of training was gradually replaced by the drilling of kihon (fundamental movements). The goal of this new training was to instill patriotism and martial spirit. Little time was spent exploring the subtleties of kata or the principles of self defense. Kata were now taught as a method of solo performance, as demonstration, and not as a subject for analysis or partner practice.Many of the more dangerous techniques in the kata were modified to prevent injury when being practiced by unskilled adolescents.
The students learning this school karate were, for the most part, unaware that this was not the original tode. In fact, many of these students went on to become instructors and unwittingly passed it on as the traditional art. Genwa Nakasone said "Itosu first taught at the Okinawa Prefecture School for Teachers but it was modern karate that he taught there, not the old style. Except for a few experts who realized he was teaching the modern form, most of the people thought he was teaching the old style, and this misunderstanding exists even today! This is a very serious misunderstanding.
Even while this new school karate was being taught openly, there were tode masters who continued to teach the original karate, to chosen students, behind closed doors. Some of them even taught school karate during the day and traditional karate in the evening. These instructors were mainly the more literate nobles who had formerly held administrative positions at the palace, but now were forced, through economic circumstance, to accept teaching positions in order to make a living. Thus, the original tode was preserved and passed on, to a few, through private instruction.
He (Itosu) taught karate secretly at his home to a select group of about six or seven followers. They trained in Bu (or karate as practice as a martial art), not as sport, as they do now.
Gichen Funakoshi (18681957), often called The Father of Japanese Karate, was trained in traditional tode from childhood, by some of the most famous masters of the period." In 1888, he became an assistant teacher in the Okinawan school system. There, he taught the Chinese classics, Japanese literature, and after 1900, school karate. Following a series of karate demonstrations, he traveled to Tokyo where, in 1922, he established karate clubs in several of the most respected Japanese universities. Very early on, Funakoshi had recognized that he would have to modify his art to make it more acceptable to the mainland Japanese. Although karate had been taught in the Okinawan school system for over twenty years, it was still a comparatively informal and unstructured activity. Unlike the Japanese martial arts (Kendo, Judo, etc.), karate had no established ryu (systems); no formal syllabus; no ranking hierarchy; no lists of techniques; no written history; no uniforms. It was, therefore, viewed by the Japanese as deficient compared to their well documented, well organized, highly structured martial systems.
Funakoshi would go on to make many, more substantive, changes: I embarked upon other tasks of revision and simplification. ---- I set about revising the kata so as to make them as simple as possible. Times change, the world changes, and obviously the martial arts must change too. The karate that high school students practice today is not the same karate that was practiced even as recently as ten years ago, and it is a long way indeed from the karate that I learned when I was a child in Okinawa.
While a small number of schools still teach traditional, kata-centric karate, by far the vast majority of instruction available today is in modern karate.
Finally, kata is not, and never was, preparation for hand to hand combat. The ancient Japanese art of jujitsu was originally developed as the defensive methodology for Samurai who found themselves unarmed or needed to subdue an opponent without the use of weapons. Karate is not jujitsu, and was never intended for use on a battlefield.
In fact, many of these students went on to become instructors and unwittingly passed it on as the traditional art
Great. Because as I said, if you can find someone who is known, it would be great. It's just that we don't know of anybody
I'll continue to look over my notes but at this point I don't know what I'll find.
I feel that what is being said here is that the students being taught the 'school' karate then passed on what they learned, in good faith, as authentic original karate. (This in no way implies that the Masters did not pass on their knowledge to selected students.) This is certainly what I could believe happened with regard to the teaching of Westerners in Japan after the war. What I was taught back in the early 80's is what I would call 'schoolboy' karate now. Unfortunately many instructors are still teaching that way.The students learning this school karate were, for the most part, unaware that this was not the original tode. In fact, many of these students went on to become instructors and unwittingly passed it on as the traditional art. Genwa Nakasone said "Itosu first taught at the Okinawa Prefecture School for Teachers but it was modern karate that he taught there, not the old style. Except for a few experts who realized he was teaching the modern form, most of the people thought he was teaching the old style, and this misunderstanding exists even today! This is a very serious misunderstanding.
My only point of disagreement would be your comment on ju-jutsu. Agreed karate is not ju-jutsu but many of the elements are common to both, just no longer drilled in "school" karate.
Since I have been studying aikido I find that many of the moves in kata match perfectly almost all of the locks, holds, and throws that we train in aikido. The association between aikido and ju-jutsu is the basis from which I link ju-jutsu and karate.There are similarities between some of the non-percussive techniques of karate and certain ju-jitsu techniques, and there are similarities to Chinese chin-na. I could find no direct link to ju-jitsu in Okinawan karate.
I did see a reference to a small group of samurai who fled the Satsuma, and Japan, to land in Okinawa. By that same token, it is claimed that Matsumura studied Jigen Ryu in Japan, and if he studied sword work you would think he would be exposed to the Japanese grappling arts. There is no eveidence of this however.