Bee Brian
Blue Belt
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2020
- Messages
- 267
- Reaction score
- 17
About Bob Sapp...
Let me think of a few names here... Lesnar, Sapp, Pudzian, Thompson, Coleman, maybe more. These are dudes who were pretty big. Not FAT, just big with muscles. Let's not overcomplicate this discussion by weeding out the ones who can't lift X amount of weight. Come on, who cares? They're all strong enough.
Sincerely, that's the kind of boxer I wanna be. Minimal technique, lots of raw power. But Bob Sapp is a special case in that his record is just complete poop. He's a joke. But in another thread, I think it was KO-Karate who posted a picture of a "big" Sapp. Except that that picture didn't do Sapp justice, because it was Sapp out of his prime. It was Sapp reduced to James Thompson size. He wasn't the same. I'm talking about the Sapp who beat the living hell out of Ernesto Hoost. My God, it was like an off-season Ronnie Coleman with bigger joints. The version KO-Karate posted had far skinnier arms.
I just watched a YouTube documentary of the whole Sapp versus Hoost shenanigan. I watched both their fights, in which Sapp won both. Same scenario played out... Sapp bulldozed Hoost, TANKED EVERYTHING, then beat the living hell out of Hoost.
I mean, can't you all see the issue here? Hoost was on a winning streak for more than THREE YEARS before an ungraceful, but physically imposing monster ran through him. There's gotta come a point when an opponent is so strong that no amount of clever tricks can beat him. Take note, and I do have to emphasize, this wasn't the depleted Sapp that James Thompson beat. This was Silverback Sapp. And what amazed me more than anything in their first fight was the dude survived all of Hoost's leg kicks. A lankier fighter would not have been able to stand up after that.
I really do have to ask all of you what the appeal is over becoming another Nick Diaz. Why can't you all just eat a lot, lift a lot, and get big? AND THEN supplement all that lifting with SOME technique? More than discussing which one is more effective, we also gotta talk about the issue of which is more honorable. Look... If you are being bullied by a much bigger person who is being violent against you, by all means, become a better fighter. Learn the tricks. Learn techniques. You kinda HAVE to to survive. But to put all your hopes and chances of success on PURE TRICKERY? AND THEN WIN A FIGHT because you were too afraid to take the direct route? You took the path of least resistance?
Why do so many people in the world aspire to become the second Floyd May-feather-fist?
I'm not saying go crazy and rely on pure brute strength. That's stupid. What I'm saying is there is no honor in winning a fight because you know how to manipulate the human body in a way that a truly stronger fighter doesn't know how to deal with. People go to prize fights to be entertained. There is such a thing as too gruesome a fight. People still have compassion. But a few bruises here and there is fine. They want two warriors duking it out in an all-out assault, not dance around like an effeminate butterfly and sting like a bee at times when the opponent is not in a position to hit back.
Forget the term "martial arts". This is about fighting. Fighting, in its earliest days, is a ritualistic violence, a display of courage. If winning a fight truly becomes worth it, then yes, yes, yes. Learn tricks. It's justified. But sport combat is not war. This is entertainment. We all wanna see a good fight. Because if you're a boring fighter who keeps winning, and you are fighting in the Roman arena, and then you finally get bested, the audience are not gonna want you to be spared...
LIFT WEIGHTS.
Watch the comments on that video and realize the reality of being weak but clever in times that it's not called for.
Let me think of a few names here... Lesnar, Sapp, Pudzian, Thompson, Coleman, maybe more. These are dudes who were pretty big. Not FAT, just big with muscles. Let's not overcomplicate this discussion by weeding out the ones who can't lift X amount of weight. Come on, who cares? They're all strong enough.
Sincerely, that's the kind of boxer I wanna be. Minimal technique, lots of raw power. But Bob Sapp is a special case in that his record is just complete poop. He's a joke. But in another thread, I think it was KO-Karate who posted a picture of a "big" Sapp. Except that that picture didn't do Sapp justice, because it was Sapp out of his prime. It was Sapp reduced to James Thompson size. He wasn't the same. I'm talking about the Sapp who beat the living hell out of Ernesto Hoost. My God, it was like an off-season Ronnie Coleman with bigger joints. The version KO-Karate posted had far skinnier arms.
I just watched a YouTube documentary of the whole Sapp versus Hoost shenanigan. I watched both their fights, in which Sapp won both. Same scenario played out... Sapp bulldozed Hoost, TANKED EVERYTHING, then beat the living hell out of Hoost.
I mean, can't you all see the issue here? Hoost was on a winning streak for more than THREE YEARS before an ungraceful, but physically imposing monster ran through him. There's gotta come a point when an opponent is so strong that no amount of clever tricks can beat him. Take note, and I do have to emphasize, this wasn't the depleted Sapp that James Thompson beat. This was Silverback Sapp. And what amazed me more than anything in their first fight was the dude survived all of Hoost's leg kicks. A lankier fighter would not have been able to stand up after that.
I really do have to ask all of you what the appeal is over becoming another Nick Diaz. Why can't you all just eat a lot, lift a lot, and get big? AND THEN supplement all that lifting with SOME technique? More than discussing which one is more effective, we also gotta talk about the issue of which is more honorable. Look... If you are being bullied by a much bigger person who is being violent against you, by all means, become a better fighter. Learn the tricks. Learn techniques. You kinda HAVE to to survive. But to put all your hopes and chances of success on PURE TRICKERY? AND THEN WIN A FIGHT because you were too afraid to take the direct route? You took the path of least resistance?
Why do so many people in the world aspire to become the second Floyd May-feather-fist?
I'm not saying go crazy and rely on pure brute strength. That's stupid. What I'm saying is there is no honor in winning a fight because you know how to manipulate the human body in a way that a truly stronger fighter doesn't know how to deal with. People go to prize fights to be entertained. There is such a thing as too gruesome a fight. People still have compassion. But a few bruises here and there is fine. They want two warriors duking it out in an all-out assault, not dance around like an effeminate butterfly and sting like a bee at times when the opponent is not in a position to hit back.
Forget the term "martial arts". This is about fighting. Fighting, in its earliest days, is a ritualistic violence, a display of courage. If winning a fight truly becomes worth it, then yes, yes, yes. Learn tricks. It's justified. But sport combat is not war. This is entertainment. We all wanna see a good fight. Because if you're a boring fighter who keeps winning, and you are fighting in the Roman arena, and then you finally get bested, the audience are not gonna want you to be spared...
LIFT WEIGHTS.
Watch the comments on that video and realize the reality of being weak but clever in times that it's not called for.