I'm a bit bothered by the phrase ...
but to those of us who train to defend ourselves ... that does seem to be a bit snarky, don't you think?
Well ... let's dig a bit deeper, then.
The first technique we usually learn in American Kenpo is 'Delayed Sword'. An uncomplicated technique consisting of several basics.
- A Right Neutral Bow Stance
- A Right Inward Block
- A Right Snapping Ball Kick
- A Right Outward Handsword
These basics are in play against a
'Right Handed Lapel Grab'.
If we going to train 'Both Sides', (the 'opposite' in Kenpo terminology as I understand it), the aggressor would be executing a
'Left Handed Lapel Grab'.
Don't we already have a technique or two for dealing with that? I'm thinking "Lone Kimono", "Conquering Shield", or maybe "Snapping Twig" (realizing this technique is often taught against a push). Or perhaps we could take some of the ideas taught for 'two handed lapel grabs' and apply them, such as "Mace of Aggression", "Raking Mace", and "Twin Kimono".
Given these six techniques can be used to defend oneself against a 'Left Handed Lapel Grab', what would be the benefit of practicing the opposite of Delayed Sword? The opposite of Delayed Sword would include these basics.
- Left Neutral Bow Stance
- Left Inward Block
- Left Snapping Ball Kick
- Left Outward Handsword
I perform a Left Neutral Bow Stance in many techniques, beginning with "Attacking Mace". I perform Left Inward Block throughout the system, also beginning with "Attacking Mace". I perform a Left Snapping Ball Kick in "Checking the Storm". And the Left Outward Handsword can be found in the aforementioned "Snapping Twig".
Given further that the opposite basics that comprise 'Delayed Sword' can be found, and are utilized, in other techniques, is the a specific benefit to running these basics in the prescribed combinations of 'Delayed Sword', that is missing when choosing to leave out the 'Other Side' in your training?