FearlessFreep
Senior Master
My view of "traditional" is based on how we incorporated it. As far as I know, the militaristic etiquette (lining up) is a throwback to the days when TKD was used primarily by the military 40-50 years ago. I would also add the ethos of the Hwa Rang warriors from 1500 years ago.
Everything else is an incorporation of the three schools of Oriental thought I mentioned previously. We have never incorporated American tradition in our practice, although if you want to count handshakes and using the American flag in bowing I suppose you could.
I firmly believe if you remove these principles, you remove what makes Tae Kwon Do what it is.
I actually pretty strongly disagree with this on both counts.
First, I've been a Christian a lot longer than I've practiced Tae Kwon Do, so my own spiritual, philosophical and metaphysical belief structure is already well founded and as a result, I have little interest in martial arts for any over tones of Oriental thought.
Secondly, we are not in the military. I've been in the US Military and can understand and appreciate the need for conformity and uniformity in dealing in a military structure, especially in the context of trying to keep several hundred people organized and in line and moving as a unit. But most of us don't live in that world. A certain amount of order and cohesion is needed when attempting to organize a roomful of 20 or so students, but most of us in the dojang are not learning to work, act, and think as a unit and we don't [need to] carry that mindset out of the dojang. A marching band needs to learn to march as a single unit of cohesion, an orchestra is coordinated following one timekeeper, but a jazz band, while it needs to be tight, it's a completely different thing, a different mindset in terms of how to be co-ordinated in a group. Even that is a weak analogy because when I'm training in Taekwondo I'm not training coordinated moves in a team but just personal self-defense.
So to me things like sleeves rolled up or not or turning away from a senior to adjust your uniform or other protocol aspects fall under "well that's what the instructor uses to maintain order in a small group setting" but they have little to do with whether or not I'm improving the effectiveness of a sidekick, so as long as they don't interfere with that, then I go along. but ultimately, I'm not training to be in the South Korean army and I'm not training to improve my "Oriental thought", I'm just training to be better at protecting myself and along the way I get in better shape and have some fun. If by "traditional Taekwondo" one means "a more effective well rounded means of personal self-defense" then I'm all for it. If by "traditional Taekwondo" one means "imitating a militaristic mindset and practice from a culture and time completely alien to me", sorry, not interested