What has been some of the most practical changes in TKD over the last twenty five year in your opinion and why have those changes been good or bad for TKD?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, I've seen the pendulum swing in a direction that I didn't approve of. The change from Olympic TKD fro more of a power-based "knock out as the goal, but I can win on points" type of combative sport to a game of who can slap the hogu with a round or cut kick the quickest. Also, how many schools have lost the combative roots of TKD or teach it as an effective self defense system or martial art.
Luckily, it finally appears that at least in a decent percentage of schools, that pendulum is starting to swing back i a more positive direction. Even the WTF is making at least some reforms, so there is hope.
What has been some of the most practical changes in TKD over the last twenty five year in your opinion and why have those changes been good or bad for TKD?
The fall of the USTF and then the fall of the ITF.
There was a period there guys at tournaments would wear their cups on the outside of their pants.
quote]
This is one change that I think has been a GREAT one!!! There is nothing less appealing than watching a guy walk around with a cup and jock on the outside of his pants! I am so glad that you don't see that like you used to!
Luckily, it finally appears that at least in a decent percentage of schools, that pendulum is starting to swing back i a more positive direction. Even the WTF is making at least some reforms, so there is hope.
What has been some of the most practical changes in TKD over the last twenty five year in your opinion and why have those changes been good or bad for TKD?
The fall of the USTF and then the fall of the ITF.
Sir why do you feel this way?
I would have to say that the inclusion of sparing gear has been one of the most practical changes for TKD. I believe TKD more than other traditionally inspired MAs has embraced the use of protective equipment while sparring. At my school we geared up from head to toe and often joked how we resembled astronauts with head gear, some face-cages, mouthpieces, chest protectors, forearm pads, gloves, cups, shin pad and foot gear. When ever I described how we geared up at my school to some one from a different style or even "old school" TKDers they would typically mock me for being soft and then tell me how they sparred with no gear, that just sounded crazy to me. My master was a believer in the philosophy that if you want to be good at fighting then you have to fight. At my school we sparred every class, hard, with little restrictions and not much holding back. The only exception was the week before a promotion in order to avoid the possibility of injury that was still present even with all the protective gear. The protective equipment allowed us to spar with an intensity approaching a real fight, without it I believe we would have had to hold back too much, pulling all of our strikes or restricting them to very specific locations for safety (developing habits which I believe are counter to real SD) if not, we would run a much higher risk of seriously hurting a training partner or accumulating injury that would later hinder out ability to train and fight.
My master was a believer in the philosophy that if you want to be good at fighting then you have to fight.
Did this mean that to be good at fighting you needed pads?
Many would disagree with you as most that fight with pads have no concept of focus. Once you get good, the pads are insignificant as I could hurt you with or without them. They usually give students a false sense of security and have nothing to do with fighting. You may consider blocking as a higher premium!
I believe that the introduction of protective equipment has allowed current TKD practitioners to reintroduce a vital aspect of training that was once abandoned.
And yet... they are a primary reason why so many MAists in other styles look down on TKD as watered down, and over-emphasizing the sporting aspect over the defensive aspect.
Here's something to demonstrate what I mean, an exercise my instructor repeats on a regular basis. Face a partner, and, full speed and full power, punch at your partner's belt knot, 10 times. Touch every time. Then, still full speed and full power, punch at your partner's solar plexus, 10 times. Touch every time. Then, still full speed and full power, punch at your partner's nose, 10 times. Touch every time. This is focus. If you can do this exercise on a stationary target, change to a moving target. Expect to get hit a few times - after all, it's a martial arts class, and you're fighting - you're going to get hit, right?
Who cares what MAists in other styles think, they don't define TKD for me. MA practitioners have always made up reasons to denigrate different styles and methods. If you listened to all the detractors no one would practice any style because they're all useless.