ap Oweyn
Brown Belt
Think of kali, eskrima, and arnis the same way you'd think of the term kung fu. All it means, really, is a Filipino martial art. Not only do those terms NOT really tell you anything about the content of any given curriculum, but they change over time. I started in Doce Pares myself. At that time, arnis was the favoured term. Now, it's eskrima. That doesn't reflect any change in material. Just verbiage. Similarly, you see a lot of schools using kali now, where they might have formerly used another term.
So, arnis, eskrima, and kali all being very generic, you've already taken the next step: Identifying the specific style. Doce Pares in this case. As MJS already stated, some styles will favour one aspect of FMA over another. Some will focus on knife or stick or long range or short range or...
Doce Pares, I regard as being a fairly balanced representation of FMA, though I'd say that we were more impact based than blade based (when compared with something like Pekiti or Illustrisimo). And not particularly focused on either long range (largo mano) or short range (corto). There was content for each, but I felt like we spent most of our time at medio (medium) range.
Most FMA schools will hit on single stick, double stick, stick and dagger, single dagger, double dagger, and empty hand. You might get some time with staff (sibat) or chain (kadena), or other more obscure weapons. But you can pretty much bet on the former.
I've been practicing FMA since 1989, and have seen similarities with the other things I've trained in over the years, including the taisabaki of Shotokan karate. So I'm not surprised to hear you say that it resembles taijutsu.
As far as competition, I don't think it's required. Gearing up and doing some pressure testing, sure. But not necessarily in a sport-based format. I have competed in WEKAF stickfighting tournies before, but don't think it's essential.
Stuart
So, arnis, eskrima, and kali all being very generic, you've already taken the next step: Identifying the specific style. Doce Pares in this case. As MJS already stated, some styles will favour one aspect of FMA over another. Some will focus on knife or stick or long range or short range or...
Doce Pares, I regard as being a fairly balanced representation of FMA, though I'd say that we were more impact based than blade based (when compared with something like Pekiti or Illustrisimo). And not particularly focused on either long range (largo mano) or short range (corto). There was content for each, but I felt like we spent most of our time at medio (medium) range.
Most FMA schools will hit on single stick, double stick, stick and dagger, single dagger, double dagger, and empty hand. You might get some time with staff (sibat) or chain (kadena), or other more obscure weapons. But you can pretty much bet on the former.
I've been practicing FMA since 1989, and have seen similarities with the other things I've trained in over the years, including the taisabaki of Shotokan karate. So I'm not surprised to hear you say that it resembles taijutsu.
As far as competition, I don't think it's required. Gearing up and doing some pressure testing, sure. But not necessarily in a sport-based format. I have competed in WEKAF stickfighting tournies before, but don't think it's essential.
Stuart