Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One of my instructors (years ago) taught me tremendous respect for a lead-leg side kick. He'd throw it right at your beltline as you came in. One learned quickly to try to use an angle to get in. Nasty when done well!
I use side kick in sparring all the time - lead leg side kicks are quite fast, and very hard to stop.
The way I see it, a kick which lacks speed is one which can be evaded, unless the attacker is controlled so that he has no chance to do so. And if he is, that power can be brought decisively to bear to end the attack, if properly applied. Put those two considerations together and you get the kind of app we stress for the side kick at our school: a damaging strike on a controlled attacker's lower bodytypically the inside of the knee joint, which can easily be ruptured by such a kick in a way that won't easily heal, while the attacker is kept at close range by a hikite/pin combination or something similar. At that kind of range, he won't even see the knee coming, and a good hard strike will bring him to the ground without much chance of getting up unaided. We practice side kicks high, as serious training in balance while applying major force, but as a terminating strike we treat it as a CQ tactic.
I also enjoy the turning sidekick for competition, it works wonder on people minds. Always wanting to know how can it be thrown with that amount of speed and my response is practice.
More and more, I've come to think that repetition, correction and more repetition is 99% of success in the MAs...
Sorry Kacey, I should have prefaced my remark by stating the side kick is used very little in Olympic sparring. When we use a lead leg side kick-it is generally referred to as a "cut kick" since we are cutting off our opponent's technique or movement. And I totally agree, the cut kick can be quite fast. Even an old guy like me, with proper timing can knock down a larger person using this technique. I instruct my students that when they see their opponent's rear shoulder moving forward, that's when we cut!
Side note: when he got back from competing, he said one of the event's black belts told him that in their judging seminars, they are INSTRUCTED to NOT award points for sidekicks or punches.
It's a shame. There is nothing in the rules that I know of that should have resulted in the bias against sidekicks in Olympic style TKD.
I don't understand how it would not be as flashy...a kick that scores is a kick that scores. So it's not a headshot...how does a roundhouse kick to the hogu look more flashy than a side kick to the hogu?
That's true, but I just don't understand WHY the points are awarded on aesthetics alone. If a point is scored, as long as it's a CLEAN point, then why not count it?
By the nature of aeshtics, would a flying sidekick count?
I just don't agree with tournements being judged on what looks cool...but I don't want to derail this thread, either..just my .02.
from what I've seen...side kicks score. However, a classic back leg sidekcik just doesnt' get throqn as much as it is too slow and telegraphed in msot cases to land effectively. cut kicks (fast front leg side kick) in combination with roundhouse and axe kicks are bread and butter in Olympic TKD.
It's got nothing to do with perceived aesthetics.
Peace,
Erik
Erik, you may have missed post #29 where zDom states referees are being told not to score side kicks...
I'd still like to know why.
Sorry Kacey, I should have prefaced my remark by stating the side kick is used very little in Olympic sparring. When we use a lead leg side kick-it is generally referred to as a "cut kick" since we are cutting off our opponent's technique or movement. And I totally agree, the cut kick can be quite fast. Even an old guy like me, with proper timing can knock down a larger person using this technique. I instruct my students that when they see their opponent's rear shoulder moving forward, that's when we cut!