Taliban Leader in Secret Talks Was an Impostor

Big Don

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Messages
10,551
Reaction score
190
Location
Sanger CA
November 22, 2010
Taliban Leader in Secret Talks Was an Impostor

By DEXTER FILKINS and CARLOTTA GALL

NY TIMES EXCERPT:


KABUL, Afghanistan — For months, the secret talks unfolding between Taliban and Afghan leaders to end the war appeared to be showing promise, if only because of the appearance of a certain insurgent leader at one end of the table: Mullah Akhtar Muhammad Mansour, one of the most senior commanders in the Taliban movement.
But now, it turns out, Mr. Mansour was apparently not Mr. Mansour at all. In an episode that could have been lifted from a spy novel, United States and Afghan officials now say the Afghan man was an impostor, and high-level discussions conducted with the assistance of NATO appear to have achieved little.
“It’s not him,” said a Western diplomat in Kabul intimately involved in the discussions. “And we gave him a lot of money.”
American officials confirmed Monday that they had given up hope that the Afghan was Mr. Mansour, or even a member of the Taliban leadership.
NATO and Afghan officials said they held three meetings with the man, who traveled from in Pakistan, where Taliban leaders have taken refuge.
The fake Taliban leader even met with President Hamid Karzai, having been flown to Kabul on a NATO aircraft and ushered into the presidential palace, officials said.
The episode underscores the uncertain and even bizarre nature of the atmosphere in which Afghan and American leaders search for ways to bring the nine-year-old American-led war to an end. The leaders of the Taliban are believed to be hiding in Pakistan, possibly with the assistance of the Pakistani government, which receives billions of dollars in American aid.
Many in the Taliban leadership, which is largely made up of barely literate clerics from the countryside, had not been seen in person by American, NATO or Afghan officials.
American officials say they were skeptical from the start about the identity of the man who claimed to be Mullah Mansour — who by some accounts is the second-ranking official in the Taliban, behind only the founder, Mullah Mohammed Omar. Serious doubts arose after the third meeting with Afghan officials, held in the southern city of Kandahar. A man who had known Mr. Mansour years ago told Afghan officials that the man at the table did not resemble him. “He said he didn’t recognize him,” said an Afghan leader, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
The Western diplomat said the Afghan man was initially given a sizable sum of money to take part in the talks — and to help persuade him to return.
While the Afghan official said he still harbored hopes that the man would return for another round of talks, American and other Western officials said they had concluded that the man in question was not Mr. Mansour. Just how the Americans reached such a definitive conclusion — whether, for instance, they were able to positively establish his identity through fingerprints or some other means — is unknown.
END EXCERPT
Gee, remember that Obama was going to usher in "Smart Diplomacy,' and a "Return to competence?"
 
November 22, 2010


American officials say they were skeptical from the start about the identity of the man who claimed to be Mullah Mansour

Gee, remember that Obama was going to usher in "Smart Diplomacy,' and a "Return to competence?"

Interesting how this is can be Obama's fault.
Seems they were skeptical from the start, but not entirely sure. If Karzai and his merry men thought he was the real deal (being Afghans themselves) then I guess that the Americans gave it a shot 'just in case'.

Imo if anyone should bear blame, it's the Afghans. Seems they were convinced, and they should know, right? How would you have checked his identity? Ask him for his ID and his Taliban membership card?

I mean Obama is doing plenty of things wrong, but there's no need to blame him for everything by default.
 
Interesting how this is can be Obama's fault.
Being the man in charge, that is how it works.
I mean Obama is doing plenty of things wrong, but there's no need to blame him for everything by default.
Well, he campaigned on "Smart diplomacy" and has had one diplomatic cock up after another, pointing that out ought not be seen as blaming him for everything by default.
 
Back
Top