When I was a student and just learned "spring", I thought if I could bend my leg to the maximum and then straight it to the maximum, I could generate the maximum amount of springing force. Until one day my opponent was big and strong, I found it was not how hard that I should do, but how correct that I should do. That was the day that I realized that I had not learned enough.
I think it's because it's the suddenness of the move, more than the strength of the move, that makes a difference.
I've spent years of my life on a trampoline. Jumping on a trampoline is mostly in the calves - you just extend your feet and it launches you up.
I've also been on the trampolines where they harness you into a bungee system so you can get more hangtime and do more flips (and not snap your skull when you mess up). With these, you have to jump mostly with your quadriceps. You squat down low and push off. This is because it's not about the bounce at the bottom, but rather the hang time at the top.
Similarly, this type of a sweep is more about bouncing the opponent over your hip.
---
With that said, I'd like to change my answer above. I think the "spring" motion is more of that sudden change that happens in a blink. Where a wrist lock somewhat qualifies, the techniques I think of more are where you catch the attacker in the middle of another move.
I've never done this on purpose, but it's happened a few times where I do a wrist lock that pulls the person towards me, and they smash their face against my shoulder. That pop with the shoulder executes a similar sudden change in direction on the way down.
Some of the wrist throws I've done are similar, but they have a big buildup and then a quick release where the person is essentially unwinding their arm by letting me throw them.
This is interesting to think about.