Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but what about stuff like breaking a metal bar with your head? i just saw this the other day in a documentary where a kung fu monk
had to do this exercise in order to become a master. this is pretty impressive. can this all be explained?
It's magic tricks. Misdirection, applied physics, and the right props. Sometimes there is actual physical conditioning or martial skill involved, but not to the degree that it is being presented as.how? did they harden their skulls over time?
Well qi is a real thing. But it isn't how it is portrayed in video games or movies. You won't shoot blasts of it from your hands and you won't have glowing auras around you or anything like that.
Well qi is a real thing.
It is? Then show me the physics to prove it.
At best, you can say that the existence of qi is a matter of faith, not fact.
Best description of qi I have ever come across.
Strong Qi your healthy, weak qi your sick, no qi your dead.
No, it’s at best, the placebo effect…which can be very powerful. But if someone is charging you a lot of money for the placebo….dodgy moral grounds.For example the stuff from Karate Kid where Mr.Myagi rubs his hands and then cures Daniel's injuries.
Is this stuff real? If yes, can it be scientifically explained?
But from what I know science can also not explain chi and how somebody can bend a spear with his throat.
IMO, there is some validity to the qi concept, though the way it's described may not be the way it actually works. That's true of physics as well. The mathematical formulas may describe a concept in a fashion that allows us to work with it and see results, but the reality is unperceivable. Even in theoretical physics, some things are taken on faith. We can declare the effect (as we perceive it), but not necessarily the direct cause. Quantum mechanics is confusing and often contradictory, but the models seem to explain some reality, even if we don't know just how it works.At best, you can say that the existence of qi is a matter of faith, not fact.
The difference between Ki/Qi/Chi and quantum mechanics is that one is quantifiable, can be characterised unambiguously in a precise language (mathematics), explains the functioning of the electronics in our everyday devices… the other is quantum mechanicsIMO, there is some validity to the qi concept, though the way it's described may not be the way it actually works. That's true of physics as well. The mathematical formulas may describe a concept in a fashion that allows us to work with it and see results, but the reality is unperceivable. Even in theoretical physics, some things are taken on faith. We can declare the effect (as we perceive it), but not necessarily the direct cause. Quantum mechanics is confusing and often contradictory, but the models seem to explain some reality, even if we don't know just how it works.
Qi may not be real on its own, but if we faithfully apply its concepts and results are observed (technique execution or health-wise), does this not give some life and reality to it? Maybe not an actual reality, but a practical reality at least. In a martial art sense, qi is a convenient way to describe a number of concepts in a fashion that allows us to effectively employ them.
Qi may sound like a lot of metaphysical, philosophical hogwash. But so does quantum mechanics - there may be a duality where it may be true and untrue at the same time. In any case, here is my expert final conclusion...............
Qi is cool.
IMO, there is some validity to the qi concept, though the way it's described may not be the way it actually works. That's true of physics as well. The mathematical formulas may describe a concept in a fashion that allows us to work with it and see results, but the reality is unperceivable. Even in theoretical physics, some things are taken on faith. We can declare the effect (as we perceive it), but not necessarily the direct cause. Quantum mechanics is confusing and often contradictory, but the models seem to explain some reality, even if we don't know just how it works.
Qi may not be real on its own, but if we faithfully apply its concepts and results are observed (technique execution or health-wise), does this not give some life and reality to it? Maybe not an actual reality, but a practical reality at least. In a martial art sense, qi is a convenient way to describe a number of concepts in a fashion that allows us to effectively employ them.
Qi may sound like a lot of metaphysical, philosophical hogwash. But so does quantum mechanics - there may be a duality where it may be true and untrue at the same time. In any case, here is my expert final conclusion...............
Qi is cool.
So basically it's a fine example of the placebo effect.IMO, there is some validity to the qi concept, though the way it's described may not be the way it actually works. That's true of physics as well. The mathematical formulas may describe a concept in a fashion that allows us to work with it and see results, but the reality is unperceivable. Even in theoretical physics, some things are taken on faith. We can declare the effect (as we perceive it), but not necessarily the direct cause. Quantum mechanics is confusing and often contradictory, but the models seem to explain some reality, even if we don't know just how it works.
Qi may not be real on its own, but if we faithfully apply its concepts and results are observed (technique execution or health-wise), does this not give some life and reality to it? Maybe not an actual reality, but a practical reality at least. In a martial art sense, qi is a convenient way to describe a number of concepts in a fashion that allows us to effectively employ them.
Qi may sound like a lot of metaphysical, philosophical hogwash. But so does quantum mechanics - there may be a duality where it may be true and untrue at the same time. In any case, here is my expert final conclusion...............
Qi is cool.
For what it’s worth, I have no problems with anecdotes. I think the problem is when people want anecdotes to be believed without evidence, particularly when the story is a little out there. What I mean is, it’s not the anecdote that’s the problem. It’s the lack of independently verifiable, objective evidence.No. There is a difference between anecdotal evidence and scientific evidence.
Qi isn't justified by the stories of people who have experienced it.
I use this video on dowsing to explain the difference.
I don't really think anyone is disagreeing with this. Because if there is independently verifiable, objective evidence, it's not really an anecdote.For what it’s worth, I have no problems with anecdotes. I think the problem is when people want anecdotes to be believed without evidence, particularly when the story is a little out there. What I mean is, it’s not the anecdote that’s the problem. It’s the lack of independently verifiable, objective evidence.