JT_the_Ninja
Black Belt
JT,
There is no argument as to the importance of deep stance training for both conditioning as well as establishing a solid foundation for specific defensive and offensive techniques. However, due to a lack of understanding of function, practitioners develop improper technique as a result of the additional telegraphing movements that become a part of their movement in order to transition from one step to the next. These movements include upper body forward and backward movement that becomes necessary to get the weight off of the rear foot and draw it forward. The ITF Chungul Jaseh is, from what I have seen here in Michigan, too wide. When your front legs femur is pointing to the side, as opposed to pointing forward at the target, your power will follow the direction that the femur/knee is pointing. This wider stance also causes a side to side swaying movement that causes you to have more telegraphing than, making it easier for your opponent to read your intent.
Many confuse deeper body position with the length and width of the foot placement, or how far apart your feet are. You can still have a strong, deep stance with your feet closer together. A primary concern should always be ease of mobility. If you are stuck in a position that calls for you to include additional body movements to transition from one stance to another, you need to make adjustments.
As I have stated in the past, the best way to discuss these issues and share this information so that it is best understood, we should find a time to meet and train in person. I will be in Pittsburgh in September. I would love to have you participate in that seminar
I think you misunderstand the ITF chungul jase, then, because you've misdescribed it. Our chungul jase has both feet pointed forward, as you said, because (a) it's easier to pick up your knee from this position and (b) you have greater stability with your back foot able to lock into place to keep you from being knocked backward. I guess that's a bad reflection on the Michigan students, if they all do that kind of front stance. As someone who trains in Pittsburgh and who tests at Master Kim's dojang, I can tell you firsthand that one of the most common corrections made to front stances I hear from my SBN is "Knees pointed forward!"
As to their stances being too wide (which is why, I guess, their front femurs were pointing to the side), the feet should still be shoulder-width apart. Some people try to go too wide to get lower; that's not what I meant by training in low stances. If you have to break the stance to get lower, you're not doing it right.
You see the same thing when people try to do a keema jase too wide -- they almost do a split, often with their knees necessarily straight to keep them from collapsing. One of my seniors always called this the "house-riding stance," because you look like you're trying to straddle a triangular roof. Trying to kick, or even move, from this is far more difficult than from a good low keema jase, where your feet are just outside of shoulder-width apart, your knees bent forward, your shins more or less straight vertical, and your weight over your center-line, as opposed to leaning forward (again, to get "lower").