Quotheraving
Orange Belt
The point that standing is a good practise in Tai Chi Chuan?Me thinkest we are getting off the point here...
I thought we were staying pretty much on topic and making progress in removing ambiguity, misunderstandings and reaching a consensus of opinion. That's just my perception of the development of the discussion so far.
You are right, and while it did cross my mind to mention that body and mind are not seperate and that in finding stillness and natural balance in postures we also return to our natural mind, I feared that bringing up such could only confuse the issue Mo and I were discussing at the time. Being that, to paraphrase you, not all postures are equal or achieve the same results.A big part of or one of the point of post training is being missed completely, quieting the mind
On the contrary, I introduced stress postures as an extreme example of postures in which no connection can be made, as these are used for torture (the infliction of pain) it seemed an obvious straw man to point out that we willingly subject ourselves to pain in our training, this does however miss the point that there is a difference between muscular pain and physical damage.I don’t think that was actually something to “see coming”
You may think that I was being a smart *** by making that claim but it is the simple truth, I anticipated that response... I hoped it wouldn't be employed, even as it was in jest, especially as it potentially opens the door for other people to misunderstand and maybe even think that it's ok to stand in deep postures and experience pain while doing so without first knowing what is and what is not harmful and whether that is good pain (no pain no gain) or bad pain (injury).
You seem to be misunderstanding my motivation in this... I am not trying to attack Mo (why would I, he seems like a nice guy). Though your defence of him is rather touching.It was more of a tongue and cheek response given by someone who has a lot of experience standing in different postures.
You see, I have no way of knowing what he does or does not understand beyond what he expresses in writing, not being psychic and all , and what he 'seemed' to be saying I disagreed with.
Even when he stated that he concurred I sought to remove all possible sources of misunderstanding (as far as is practical) because I am of the opinion that it is pretty damn important to clearly and unambiguously make the distinction between structurally solid postures that do not harm the body and structurally weak postures that cause damage, not for Mo, but for any interested beginner who happens to read this.
I should add that you brought this up. As far as I was concerned we were just discussing connection and the benefits of standing generally, to quote the OP, Devlin :Santi Shi is, to many, torture it is not the same as post training (Zhan Zhuang) that is being discussed
"I was using Zhan Zhuang in a general way (probably incorrectly) to refer to standing practice and not a specific posture." *
With that in mind it seemed entirely appropriate to discuss essential principles that can be applied to any form of standing.
The rest of your post I cannot agree with more.
*on a side note I am not sure that the OP is entirely wrong in thinking that Zhan zhuang is also an umbrella term for standing in general.. I myself have always used it as such and when my curiosity was peaked by the suggestion that it refers to one specific posture I did some googling. The upshot of this is that, if it is a misunderstanding it is a nearly universal one.
Here is a good link btw, it's about Yiquan, but it's good advice all the same.
http://www.yiquan.org.uk/art-zz.html
Last edited: