sgtmac_46
Senior Master
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
- Messages
- 4,753
- Reaction score
- 189
Our system works great for dealing with the odd theft, or even the crime of passion murder. It is the protections granted American citizens by the Constitution, and it's the best system we can apply to both protect society and the rights of individual citizens.
Having intimate experience with the US civilian legal system (which is great if you're a criminal), I have NO desire to see it applied to foreign terrorists. The very idea that we should afford them the say protections is asinine and self-defeating. What does it benefit us? It keeps up some unclear abstract principle? Most of them would be back out, planting bombs and blowing up buildings in 6 months.
I haven't seen anything in that article that remotely bothers me. If it wasn't for intelligence value, I really wouldn't have cared if these terrorists had been subject to summary executions. If anyone expects me to get upset about these accusations, even if they are true, keep in mind that if I was in charge, it would probably be the same way.
Having intimate experience with the US civilian legal system (which is great if you're a criminal), I have NO desire to see it applied to foreign terrorists. The very idea that we should afford them the say protections is asinine and self-defeating. What does it benefit us? It keeps up some unclear abstract principle? Most of them would be back out, planting bombs and blowing up buildings in 6 months.
I haven't seen anything in that article that remotely bothers me. If it wasn't for intelligence value, I really wouldn't have cared if these terrorists had been subject to summary executions. If anyone expects me to get upset about these accusations, even if they are true, keep in mind that if I was in charge, it would probably be the same way.