The truth of the matter is, there is no better teacher than experience. That experience must be supported by meaningful feedback and honest contemplation. Meaningful feedback cannot be provided by the uneducated observer, as the uneducated observer is not capable of understanding what they're seeing, and the uneducated do-er is not capable of asking the correct questions.
You know, this ties in with something I have been considering.
We have focused a bit on how people trying to sell you video instruction courses do so out of a desire for money, and probably some ego.
But doesn't anybody think that someone taking a video course demonstrates a huge amount of ego?
Seriously, look at the quote by Flatlander. It is very clear that an
uneducated person can't give decent feedback. It seems very clear that this is true.
But those taking these courses seem to think that they
can give decent feedback. They do not need a teacher to point out their mistakes- they are good enough even without experience in the art!
Doesn't that strike you as being a bit egotistical?
Not only that, but consider that all the great masters really needed someone to teach them. There are stories of sword masters living with their teachers. But the video course folks think that they do not even have to be in the same time zone as their teacher. The ancient masters might have needed a real teacher- but they are too smart to have to rely on that!
Really, are we doing any favors to the dojos that want real students by convincing people that they should go to them instead of staying home with their videos?