Most studies bear out that it's just the method not the attempt. Suicide attempts remain more or less static, outside of the Suicide Contagion effect. What changes is what method is used. Even this report sort of acknowledges this when they write, "Men who owned handguns were eight times more likely than men who didn’t to die of self-inflicted gunshot wounds." Well, duh.
Right. That is exactly what the reports say. It's the difference between a suicide attempt and a suicide. As I said, someone who attempts suicide by drug overdose is only 3% likely to succeed, where someone who attempts suicide by gun is up around 85% likely to succeed. The takeaway is that people who are suicidal shouldn't have ready access to firearms.
That people spend a disproportionate amount of time worrying about the less likely events does, in fact, indicate that something is broken. It's human risk assessment.
I don't believe the time trying to prevent school shootings is disproportionate.
Okay. Let's try a different approach. You allege there is no real risk. It's not an actual problem. Right?
If I want to know the non-political evaluation of risk, where it is as cold and calculated as possible, I'm going to check out an actuarial analysis. I mean, life insurance companies HAVE to know how long you are probably going to live. The entire business model depends upon an accurate analysis of life expectancy.
According to actuaries, firearm related deaths are significant, and do have a direct impact on life expectancy in the USA. The link above provides the abstract for an actuarial study from 2005. The author says, "I show that firearm violence shortens the life of an average American by 104 days (151 days for white males, 362 days for black males). Among all fatal injuries, only motor vehicle accidents have a stronger effect."
Articles since then highlight that as recently as 2018, "Firearm fatalities are the third leading cause of injury-related death, just behind motor vehicle fatalities. Indeed, in recent years, the difference between the two has been less than 0.5 percent, and firearm fatalities have now exceeded automobile fatalities in 21 states."
Actuaries can apply their skills to help quantify firearm-related risk
theactuarymagazine.org
This isn't political, and as the article linked above says, "We deliberately do not take a stand on policy issues related to firearms. Rather, we focus on the associated insurance risks, share known data and call for further research."
Point is, if this is a bunch of handwringing and media driven hysteria, as you would like for us to believe, these guys would say so. Because for them, it's about money.