drop bear
Sr. Grandmaster
I have no idea what's going on here, I'm quite sure I'm not that drunk - yet...
@drop bear brings reason to a thread that I thought was an utterly lost cause.
Seriously dude, like wtf
Yeah sorry.
Aikido sucks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no idea what's going on here, I'm quite sure I'm not that drunk - yet...
@drop bear brings reason to a thread that I thought was an utterly lost cause.
Seriously dude, like wtf
I would say I see the opposite. It is the aggregate of all three so it is a blend of styles. More style, not less.Do we agree that the section "e" can be called as "no style"?
Okay. I'm not sure I agree, but I can get on board with your definition for the discussion.All styles = no style.
When we talk about earth people, we no longer care if one is American, Chinese, ...
- If one MA system doesn't have side kick and roundhouse kick, is that normal, or is that abnormal?
- If you train that style, would you like to know how to do side kick and roundhouse kick?
I would say I see the opposite. It is the aggregate of all three so it is a blend of styles. More style, not less.
You can find a piece of paper and write down all the
1. punch - jab, cross, hook, uppercut, back fist, hammer fist, side punch, ...,
2. kick - front kick, side kick, roundhouse kick, back kick, hook kick, spin hook kick, inside crescent kick, outside crescent kick, tornado kick, jump front kick, ...,
3. footwork,
4. block,
5. lock,
6. throw,
7. ground game,
8. ...
After that, the term "style" will have no meaning to you. Your thought?