ballen0351
Sr. Grandmaster
Id try leds i have led flashlight for work it works well but im not paying that much for a bulb.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, I see how it is. "I can do it, so **** everyone else they should have to as well."
No, I'm asking you what your point is, unless.. is it to be snide?Oh, I see how it is. "I can do it, so **** everyone else they should have to as well."
And you said this:Well, swapping out a whole house would be tough, but one bulb at a time is doable. As our bulbs burn out, we are replacing them with LEDs. Working out well, and not to tough on the budget. And as I said, we consider it an investment, because they last so long that it's unlikely we will ever have to replace them.
For you.
Doesn't mean it is for everyone. Like Bob said, a single mom struggling on min wage part time will have to choose between eating that month and buying 2 LED bulbs...
Okay. I have access to an actual keyboard now, and I wanted to go back and try to figure out where the misunderstanding occurred. I said this:
And you said this:
The straw man that you're putting on me is that I am suggesting that everyone be forced to switch. I'm not, and I don't have any idea where you got that impression.
A flood lamp bulb is about $25 at costco, and I currently use CFLs. As they burn out, we replace them, so we're not talking about buying more than one at a time.
I am curious, though. While abject poverty certainly exists in our country, there aren't too many people (single moms included) who can't afford $25 every 6000 or so hours, when a CFL burns out. That's about 250 days if the bulb is on all day, every day, or about $1 every 10 days. Are there families where just over a dollar a paycheck is THAT important? Yeah. Are most families cutting it so close? No.
This is, however, about priorities, and I would suggest that a family on a shoestring budget is probably not giving a thought to what kind of bulb they're using. And I'm not saying that they should. So, if you're talking about a poor person who can't afford it, yeah. There are families who cannot, but we're not talking about most people. We're talking about the poorest people in our country.
Frankly, this entire line of reasoning, that no one should because not everyone can, is pretty stupid. We're talking about light bulbs.
Dude. I never said, "should be doable."Ok. You are right. Instead of 1.00 a bulb, people should be able to spend 50 for one instead. Ramen is only 15 cents a package after all. Here's my problem with the idea you forwarded that this "should be doable".
You know nothing about me, and I can't really tell you which is more offensive to me. That you'd presume to lecture me about hardship, or that you'd presume I've never encountered it in my own life.I have lived, in the past, where having $50.00 left after paying for my house while working 2 jobs was a luxury, my friends providing me real meals while i lived on Mac and Cheese and Ramen trying to get ahead. I can imagine what a hardship taking 1.00 bulbs off the shelf and replacing them with 50.00 ones exclusively can be, even if you do not... it makes me angry to think of those times, and then think someone is saying "oh come on, you can do it"... when they clearly have no idea what it would truly cost someone to be put in that position.
I have never said otherwise, Bob. It's about priorities, and if you're living at a subsistence level, you're not thinking about long term savings. I would have thought this was a given.The problem is the up front costs. With a $1 bulb it's an 'oh crap, better go pick up a 4pk'. At $25, it's 'oh ****' unless you planned ahead, budgeted for it, put some cash on the side and was able to buy on sale. Most people will not think that far ahead.
Carol, I had the same issue. Shortly after I married my wife, her disabled mother moved in with us for "just a few months" which turned into almost 10 years. At the time, I was still in college. We had a son by then and my wife was working full time in retail earning about $12k per year. I worked about 30 hours per week at pretty close to minimum wage and I got about $400 per month from the GI bill. There were many months where we literally had no choice but to either pay the rent on a credit card ($750 per month at the time) or not pay it at all. By the time I graduated, my annual household income, including my MIL's income, was about 1/3rd of what we owed on credit cards.For me, when I was really broke, the issue wasn't just that I was really broke. I was really broke and had debt on a credit card with a punitively high interest rate. I was getting whacked with these nasty finance charges, month after month. There are basically only two ways out of that jail -- go bankrupt, or pay it off. I chose the latter. Any extra dime I had went to paying that damn card off.
True, $25 over x amount of time isn't that much. The trouble is, my credit card was full of $X charges over Y amount of time for purchases I made trying to survive when I was unemployed or underemployed. That lead to Z-hundred dollars per month in finance charges. Based on what I read about consumer debt in this country....there are a lots and lots of people currently in the situation I used to be in. Add that quantity with the people who are desperately poor and I suspect that number is significant. Yes, at a time like that, a $1 incandescent vs. a $25 LED makes a big difference.
Now? I'm grateful to be in a position where I can consider a pricey light bulb. I am also glad to have the option of installing a 10-year bulb in a location that is not the easiest to change. But I also think we need to have the same lower-cost option that we have had all along, and I am disappointed to see that regulation has perhaps escalated the closure of U.S. factories -- I believe the last domestic manufacturer shuttered a few months ago.
I have never said otherwise, Bob. It's about priorities, and if you're living at a subsistence level, you're not thinking about long term savings. I would have thought this was a given.
That might be true if CFLs weren't so inexpensive. You can get an 18 pack of 60watt CFLs for $1.89 per bulb. Locally, (and before anyone accuses me of something ridiculous, I KNOW that this means not everyone has access to it), PSE offers instant rebates, lowering the price even further.Steve -- I think you've ended up taking the brunt of the general frustration about a $50 lightbulb winning a prize for "economy." Without seeing the actual definition of economy in the contest, that certainly is a little mind-boggling.
And... by the federal elimination of standard incandescents, they taken those folks at bare subsistence, and pushed them over the edge. I predict more apartment/house fires as more people find themselves using candles or lanterns, among other unintended side effects, like I bet we see some more declines in grades -- because kids won't be able to study at home because they don't have lights to read by... Sure, you save lots over time -- but if you don't have the money up front, you can't benefit from those savings.
"Well, swapping out a whole house would be tough, but one bulb at a time is doable. As our bulbs burn out, we are replacing them with LEDs. Working out well, and not to tough on the budget. And as I said, we consider it an investment, because they last so long that it's unlikely we will ever have to replace them."
That's the entire post. As I said in an earlier response, if you have an agenda, I can see how you'd be able to twist the meaning. In context, however, how the effing hell do you get the impression I'm talking about any household other than my own? I never said "you." I said "we" meaning my family.
Two separate statements, back to back, in the same paragraph. But, you know, how about this? How about giving me the goddamn benefit of the doubt? Instead of presuming the worst, why don't you try doing the opposite? How about speaking for yourself instead of presuming to speak for me? Try that. It works.Ok fair enough... your post said, as we both quoted above "Well, swapping out a whole house would be tough, but one bulb at a time is doable" and the We are doing them one at a time statement came after... so I took that as two separate statements: It should be doable, and We are doing it, and put them together as It should be doable because we are doing it.
As far as who you are or what your past is... you are right, I don't know, and not to make assumptions about that but based on my interpenetration of the above it wasn't a far stretch for me to assume that because you thought if you could do it anyone could that you didn't take into account people who were already stretched beyond their means. So, I am sorry if I misunderstood you, but to be fair the way that was worded may not be as clear as you think it is.