First Amendment
I don't see them as harmless.
I don't see them as harmless.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not endorsing violent opposition to the rally, just wondering if those who support the Klan's right to march are doing it from a principled First Amendment stance or because they see them as mostly harmless.
I support their right to march from a principled First Amendment stance. One need only take a peek at some of the filfth being promulgated over on the Stormfront to see the insidious nature of the First Amendment rights of people like that in action.
The First Amendment itself is not "harmless." It was radical and subversive in 1791, and it's still radical and subversive-even more so.
"Freedom of Religion," "Freedom of the Press," "Freedom of Speech," "Freedom of Assembly," and "Freedom to Petition" : all these things were exceptions in most countries then, and still are-these things do not exist in a great many countries today, and we take them for granted at their-and our peril.
The fact that they assemble and speak to deny people like myself those rights, well, just goes to show that they're *******s that will never quite get it......
I support their right to march from a principled First Amendment stance. One need only take a peek at some of the filfth being promulgated over on the Stormfront to see the insidious nature of the First Amendment rights of people like that in action.
Once a single member of a Neo-Nazi group commits a crime. The leader goes to jail. I say let them congrgate.There will be a Nazi rally under the Gateway Arch in St. Louis on April 18, 2009.
I've been seeing fliers that speak out against their rally, and plans for counter-rallies.
I think both should be able to occur, regardless of my distaste for Nazi beliefs, and what that group represents.
However, a lot of my acquaintances are talking about "beating them up" and "teaching them a lesson."
How are you to get your ideological point across the hate line while you're attacking someone for having strong beliefs?
I say just let them talk their talk, and leave the city. No counter rally. No press. Nothing. If Nazi belief is so detested in the US, then I say ignore it.
I also consider why they are there. They are there hoping - praying - that people will show up to protest them. Do they really think, in a million years, that people will come to their rallies and convert to their way of thinking? No, they don't think that - they're not that stupid.
But when the 'opposition' shows up, they get news coverage. The Nazis marched in Skokie, film at eleven. If there is a riot, so much the better.
So why give them what they want?
They actually managed it a few years back, in Beloit, Wisconsin.
When the Klan held a rally there, the city responded with a counter-demonstration on the other side of town. Free entry, they had a mini-circus, rides for the kids, local performers, demonstrations from various ethnic coalitions for peace, free hot dogs and balloons and face-painting, and they publicized it like crazy for weeks beforehand. Really did it up right. The day came, the Klan stood on the courthouse steps with their bullhorns and a couple dozen protesters. They yelled and sang for an hour and then packed up and left town. Even the news crews weren't covering them. Everybody was having fun on the other side of town, busy NOT hating each other. Imagine that.
I absolutely agree with you on this. I feel the best way is to not give them any media coverage at all. Like you stated just ignore the fact and they are protesting and they will gain nothing from it. "Teaching them a lesson" will only show them that people think they are a threat and would more likely strengthen their resolve.There will be a Nazi rally under the Gateway Arch in St. Louis on April 18, 2009.
I've been seeing fliers that speak out against their rally, and plans for counter-rallies.
I think both should be able to occur, regardless of my distaste for Nazi beliefs, and what that group represents.
However, a lot of my acquaintances are talking about "beating them up" and "teaching them a lesson."
How are you to get your ideological point across the hate line while you're attacking someone for having strong beliefs?
I say just let them talk their talk, and leave the city. No counter rally. No press. Nothing. If Nazi belief is so detested in the US, then I say ignore it.
Everybody was having fun on the other side of town, busy NOT hating each other. Imagine that.
....who took my slingshot, smiled and said, You better go home, now,
and so I did. :lol:
Naturally, I'd neither recommend or condone such foolish action today, but now, nearly 40 years later, I can still savor the satisfaction, and can understand the impulse.....
I fully agree that public confrontations with these skunks at their demonstrations only help them. Nobody showing up, by contrast, illustrates how pathetic they are.
But ignore them? No.
I would not be the least bit surprised that they haven't planted members in government agencies, universities, etc.
Eh? Stormfront is a message board full of miserable people blaming everyone but themselves for their problems. How do you make that "they" are so powerful that they are planting people here and there?
.I was merely mentioning Stormfront as an example of hatemongers in the web world. Did you see the size of that forum? Perhaps I was a bit over the top, but I would not be surprised if the movement hasn't got its plants here or there.
The Holocaust did happen, and it was far worse than most imagine. Those survivors are dying off quickly, and that memory needs to be kept alive. The Nazis were a laughed at fringe group in the early 1920's.... what a terrible difference a decade, and then another, made.
Never forget, and never again.