Chris Parker
Grandmaster
Ah, you edited while I was editing… we'll chalk that up to synchronicity, yeah?
Nah, no need for you to stop talking… I might suggest focusing more on questions, seeking clarification ("I thought it was this… is that not correct?"), rather than making statements when you're not actually in the know, so to speak… but really, if you hadn't posted, then I wouldn't have had the opportunity to clarify, which could help others who are thinking similar things as yourself.
Absolutely keep being engaged here… we like that… just remember that there are people here that have been doing this much longer than you… in cases, twice as long as you've been alive… and don't be discouraged when you get corrected. We're doing it to help your understanding.
Speaking of…
Uh… no. Jujutsu (never "jujitsu"… never "focused on the use of weapons"… some systems, particularly the older ones, would incorporate weaponry into the syllabus a fair bit… or, more commonly, it would be a weapon art (naginata, kenjutsu, sojutsu etc) which would have a jujutsu aspect to it, or a jujutsu section… which might be purely unarmed in and of itself, or might have a range of weaponry concepts itself, whether using, defending against, or both.
When it comes to "how it's taught now", most of what's taught under that name really bears little resemblance to anything to do with Japanese jujutsu at all (historically, culturally, conceptually, technically, strategically, tactically, and so on)… those that actually are Japanese jujutsu are still the same as they were. And yeah, some forms had very little weaponry… by and large, they were later developed systems during the Tokugawa period (Edo Jidai), which was a period of peacetime (and isolation). The lack of warfare allowed the systems to focus more on single areas, develop in a wider array of forms, gain greater sophistication in technical approaches, and more.
God damn it. I really need to stop speaking. Yeah, Chris, while trying to prove my own point I realized that you were right. Fair play.
Nah, no need for you to stop talking… I might suggest focusing more on questions, seeking clarification ("I thought it was this… is that not correct?"), rather than making statements when you're not actually in the know, so to speak… but really, if you hadn't posted, then I wouldn't have had the opportunity to clarify, which could help others who are thinking similar things as yourself.
Absolutely keep being engaged here… we like that… just remember that there are people here that have been doing this much longer than you… in cases, twice as long as you've been alive… and don't be discouraged when you get corrected. We're doing it to help your understanding.
Speaking of…
Japanese Jujitsu focused on the use of weapons at that time with a secondary emphasis on unarmed combat. I assumed it was the other way around because that's how it's always taught nowadays, I wonder why it changed? It's a shame, I'd love to learn a weapons art.
Uh… no. Jujutsu (never "jujitsu"… never "focused on the use of weapons"… some systems, particularly the older ones, would incorporate weaponry into the syllabus a fair bit… or, more commonly, it would be a weapon art (naginata, kenjutsu, sojutsu etc) which would have a jujutsu aspect to it, or a jujutsu section… which might be purely unarmed in and of itself, or might have a range of weaponry concepts itself, whether using, defending against, or both.
When it comes to "how it's taught now", most of what's taught under that name really bears little resemblance to anything to do with Japanese jujutsu at all (historically, culturally, conceptually, technically, strategically, tactically, and so on)… those that actually are Japanese jujutsu are still the same as they were. And yeah, some forms had very little weaponry… by and large, they were later developed systems during the Tokugawa period (Edo Jidai), which was a period of peacetime (and isolation). The lack of warfare allowed the systems to focus more on single areas, develop in a wider array of forms, gain greater sophistication in technical approaches, and more.