Cain's got moxie.
At its core though, I agree with Mr. Freeman's criticism. I'm not a particular fan of the President, but if President Obama is truly this terrible, horrible, no good, very bad President then there's no reason or excuse for the racial commentary. Racial comments aren't the focus of tea-party gatherings that I have seen, but there doesn't see much effort to distance the on-topic messages from the personal attacks if/when they occur. I find it interesting that the local tea party groups were guaranteed the eyes of the President (he visited to speak at our high school), the signs were all on-topic and civil. Critical, but civil. There was no vitriol in the crowd, you had conservatives standing next to Obama supporters and everyone was peaceful. NH politics as its best...active, serious, but respectful. I'd open my door to just about any of those folks at any time.
But it seems to me that when a media audience isn't guaranteed, criticisms turn to personal attacks and outrageous statements, perhaps in the hopes for attention. No wants to distance themselves. They are too afraid to reduce their clout by having fewer bodies under their tent. A personal attack is OK as long as its the other side. If the barre to entry is that low, then that's not a group that I would stand with.