- Joined
- Mar 18, 2005
- Messages
- 10,826
- Reaction score
- 617
The police report (there was no medical report) stated that he had an lacerations to the back of his head. Which he did not seek medical attention for, and which the police stated were not serious. This is not consistent with "bashed his head against the concrete over and over". And for that matter, if Zimmerman's head was being pounded into the concrete "over and over", how did he manage to draw and fire? You simply accept his story uncritically.
Again, you don't know what went on. The injuries he received are consistent with the story that he told, and the police agree. Right away, this puts a huge obstacle in an attempt to find him guilty beyond any reasonable doubt.
That is Zimmerman's story, which you again accept uncritically, and is contravened by other testimony - which you have ignored.
The testimony of Zimmerman was supported by the evidence, and the police. If there really is some piece of evidence that shows otherwise, I'd really like to see it. Until it shows itself, though, you still can't prove him guilty beyond any reasonable doubt.
Interestingly, it was leaked recently that the lead investigator wanted manslaughter charges, but the prosecutor disagreed. Who knows if it's true or *** covering, and it doesn't explain Chief Lee's statements, but it might cut against this.
Investigators do not decide what charges are brought forth. That is the sole decision of the prosecuting attorney. Thus, what the purported leak claims is of no relevance here.
That's not what I've called for. Don't be an *******, please.
Please feel free to attack the message. I choose not to engage in personal attacks here.
On another note, you somehow forgot to mention vandalism of school property in Martin's listing...