He was a great speaker yes, he was also a criminal
He's also irrelevant-kind of like Ronald Reagan-whose presidency resulted in more criminal indictments than any in history.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was a great speaker yes, he was also a criminal
indictments dont equal convictions.
........talk to you later
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Webster Hubbell[/FONT] [FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Jim McDougal[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Susan McDougal[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Gov. Jim Guy Tucker[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Stephen Smith[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]David Hale[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Eugene Fitzhugh[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Charles Matthews[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Robert W. Palmer[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Chris Wade[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Neal T. Ainley[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Larry Kuca[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Henry Espy[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]James Lake[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]William J. Marks, Sr.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]John Latham[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]John Haley[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Michael Brown (Ron Brown's son)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Eugene Lum[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Nora Lum[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Johnny Chung[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Tyson Foods[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Sun Diamond Growers[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Richard Douglas[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]James Lake[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Ron Blackley[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Smith Barney[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Crop Growers Corporation[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Brook Keith Mitchell Sr.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Five M Farming Enterprises[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]John J. Hemmingson[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Alvarez T. Ferrouillet, Jr.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Municipal Healthcare Cooperative[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Ferrouillet & Ferrouillet[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Linda Jones[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Patsy Jo Wooten[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Allen Wooten[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Roger Clinton[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Dan Lasater[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Bill McCuen[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Dan Harmon[/FONT]
That, of course, is McClellan referring to that other selfappointed stalwart, Richard Clark.Well, why, all of a sudden, if he (Richard Clarke) had all these grave concerns, did he not raise these sooner? This is one-and-a-half years after he left the administration. And now, all of a sudden, he’s raising these grave concerns that he claims he had. And I think you have to look at some of the facts. One, he is bringing this up in the heat of a presidential campaign. He has written a book and he certainly wants to go out there and promote that book
Then again, there is the profit motive:
.
Gee, maybe if he acts fast he can write as much fiction as Twain.Yeah, and why not? He's got a story to tell, and people are buying it.....it's the #1 Bestseller on Amazon.com
Gee, maybe if he acts fast he can write as much fiction as Twain.
This might be a paranoid machiavellian fantasy,
But the trouble with such a book is that people with far more credibility and talent have been pumping them out for years.
The best Scottie McClellan could hope for with such a book -- assuming some soft-hearted conservative gave him a break and bothered publishing it all -- would be mostly heavily discounted "sales" basically given out freely to people who attended his mostly-skipped speeches at conservative conferences. "Sales," mostly at a bargain-basement practically-giving-them-away price, that would number in the tens of thousands... if it was a halfway decent book.
Which it probably wouldn't be.
But a purported takedown of the president... a tale of duplicity and impeachment-level crimes and misdemeanors from a "Bush insider"... well, that would sell like gangbusters on the left, wouldn't it?
Scott McClellan could not easily sell his book to conservatives, who basically considered him, at best, an amiable incompetent, far removed from any serious policy decisionmaking and with nothing terribly interesting to say. It's not that we wished him ill. It's just that we pretty much regarded him precisely the way the liberal media regarded him, as a nebbishy dunce who could barely string three talking points together, nevermind a whole book.
But change the audience, write the exact opposite of the book you first pitched to publishers, and you've got a chance at a bestseller.
...
yep...LOL
Occham's razor
the simplest answer is usually it. he got greedy is a LOT simpler than some complex mis-direction operation