ralphmcpherson
Senior Master
I always imagined the "walking away from fights" thing to be more a result of popularity in western society. Most of the parents of students I talk to are very certain about wanting little johnny to be able to fight but are equally certain they do not want little johnny getting into fights. One of our students (a 17 year old 1st dan) was attacked by 3 school bullies after school and beat all 3 up pretty badly. The school suspended him for a week and his father applauded the school for doing so. I felt sorry for him, what was he supposed to do, just stand there and let them beat him up? From what Ive seen parents get off on the whole "walk away from fights" thing, so Ive just assumed that teaching it is good for business.The tenets are a General Choi creation; it is not part of Kukki Taekwondo, although many dojang have adopted it as part of their curriculum.
The idea of walking away from fights is, I believe, a uniquely Japanese concept. I am told that Chinese martial arts had no such prohibitions, at least not as strongly stated as in Japanese styles. In Japan, the concept was necessary because Samurai would test themselves against other Samurai, and their tests were with live blades. Ordinary Japanese did not have swords and in general did not attack each other anyway so it was unnecessary for them to have any sort of formalized code. But samurai were a different story, hence the concept that the sword should remain in its scabbard.