Twin Fist
Grandmaster
uh....no
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're also looking at an economy in L.A. where you can't get an apartment for less than $1500 per month - and that's a studio. Cost of living there is abominable.
Now to all these wonderful salary comparisons I see on the news; Funny thing about statistics, the actual number they give you is absolutely meaningless without the data to back it up and the formulas used to get to that statistic.
Absolutely untrue. My mother-in-law just moved out of a one-bedroom apartment which was $800. Up until two years ago, I rented a two-bedroom condo for $1,200.
I also purchased a home just outside of L.A. County (3,374 sq. ft., 5 bedroom, 3 full baths, office) for $2,500.
Yeah? My sister-in-law can't find deals like this. Please private message me - she is on the verge of being homeless because of the economy and saturated market. She is renting A ROOM for $800/month.
Either you mean $2.5M, $250K or your mortgage pmt is $2,500. If either the first or the latter, you've proven my point - real estate in California *IS* abominable. We sold my mother's home, in need of serious repair and update, back on '02 for $395K. That's in Fountain Valley near the Santa Ana and Garden Grove borders, just off of Harbor and Edinger. Other homes on that block sold in the high $800k. They are three bedroom ranches.
If you meant $250k, that's still more than any of my houses are worth. We pull in a little more than the average teacher's salary per year and if it weren't for rental income from our other mortgage-free rentals, we could not pay the mortgage on our residence on his salary alone.
Oh yeah, and he's UNION!!!!! :fart:
no one says TEACHERS are evil, teachers UNIONS however need to ****ing GO
Unions ended sweatshop conditions and 18 hour work days.
"These are the values inspiring those brave workers in Poland ... They remind us that where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost." --Ronald Reagan, Labor Day Address at Liberty State Park, 1980
So, while I get that teachers are not the "bad guys", I just don't get why they should be exempt from the pains that others are having to deal with, including those in the private sector. This argument is somewhat simplistic, I understand, if you consider issues of graft, corruption, etc., but that will always be the case in government entities, in my opinion.
he wasnt referring to PUBLIC workers Bruno. WHich i am pretty sure you know.
he FIRED public workers that tried striking as i recall...
he wasnt referring to PUBLIC workers Bruno. WHich i am pretty sure you know.
he FIRED public workers that tried striking as i recall...
I meant that my monthly mortgage payment is $2,500 a month for my house. The initial mortgage amount was $356K, which isn't bad at all given the size of the house. The backyard is a little small for my tastes, but what are ya gonna do.
LEOs and firefighters here took a cut in pay so that we didn't have to lose any workers. Guess what? They cut staffing anyway about a year later. We have people getting into injury accidents who don't even get a police response anymore. And they're going to cut more.Now, to be fair, I am a police sergeant and my wife is a deputy sheriff, so its not like we don't make decent money. But since we are talking union stuff, in my department we just passed our contract, union negotiated, and took a 10% cut in pay and benefits, and that includes the Chief of Police. And most of us did it without too much griping about it. Why? Because we knew we had to. We did it to avoid layoffs. (Though to be honest, I would much rather have demoted some people and/or laid people off, but I'm mercenary like that. Quite frankly, we do a lot more work then surrounding cities who make more money.)
No no no no no.In terms of schools, the school board in my city just had an emergency budget session open to the public last night. They currently are running a $12 Million deficit, projected to be $32 Million next year, and $56 Million in the 2012 - 2013 fiscal year. They are deciding to lay off about 194 people in order to help close the budget gap. Of course, people are complaining, but what are they supposed to do (assuming that they are being financially competent with the money, which none of us believe is the case).
So, while I get that teachers are not the "bad guys", I just don't get why they should be exempt from the pains that others are having to deal with, including those in the private sector. This argument is somewhat simplistic, I understand, if you consider issues of graft, corruption, etc., but that will always be the case in government entities, in my opinion.
I'm not sure where you are going with this. Salary comparisons would be a relatively simple thing to do in terms of dollar amounts. If you are refering to trying to compare it to the cost of living in a given area, sure, it would be more difficult. But the actual comparisons would be pretty straight forward.
If we are trying to cut teachers salaries, because, they don't have classes during the summer, and our children are falling behind the rest of the world in math and science, why not run school year round? We could hate the teachers less and teach our children more. Its a win win. Or we could quit requiring teaching degrees and get out of work actors to read a script. Thats where we are headed anyway.
Sean
if the educational stats were getting BETTER i dont think anyone would be complaining... but again, you cannot spend what you do not have
Don't believe in school year round. First more is not always better. If the quality sucks how much are they learning really? second, let kids be kids. They'll have to know about work and work a lot when they get older.