As a studio owner/operator, I am constantly bombarded with requests to train children. Usually, I show the parents my curriculum and expectations and they go elsewhere. The reasoning behind their decisions usually encompasses one or more of what is listed below...
1. The curriculum is extensive. There is a lot to remember and a lot to practice. Most kids don't have the discipline or the time to do this because they want to be in lots of other things too (little league, soccar, football, hockey, etc...).
2. The curriculum is full of techniques that are obviously dangerous. Joint locks, chokes, real strikes, falls and throws, etc...many parents don't want their children exposed to this type of stuff, for obvious reasons.
3. We spar realistically at all levels of engagement. I require contact when we spar and I require students to buy the proper safety equipment and since we work everything from grappling to stand-up there is quite a list that needs to be purchased. On top of this, our sparring looks hard.
4. No tournaments. I don't train students for competition. I don't have time and I don't have the will to do so. Although we incorporate some sporting aspects into our training, we just don't focus on that.
5. Advancement is slow. I tell students that the minimum time that you can earn your blackbelt, with no previous training, is five years. And this is only possible if you really dedicate yourself to training and spend lots of time practicing. On top of this, we only have four belts and the tests are usually 1 to 2 years apart.
I don't have anything against kids training. In fact, I like it when they do train at my dojang because I think they get a more realistic view of what the martial arts are supposed to be. Also, even though I've experimented with a separate curriculum in the past, I just didn't have time to teach both.
Some recent developments, however, may change this. One of them is that my wife is getting back into training and that she wants to be a martial arts role model for our daughter who is five. Another is that I have other students who have daughters who are a little to young to do what we are currently doing, but are still interested in the martial arts. The bottom line is that if I started this kids class, I could probably five to six girls right off the bat, including my daughter who is really showing interest in training. Time is no longer an excuse for me either as my wife has offered to teach this class.
With that being said, I have been pondering what I may want the kids curriculum to look like. My initial thoughts surrounded doing something along the lines of what most organizations do for their regular curriculum. They basically follow the model that Itosu Sensei created...line drills of basic techniques, sanitized kata, and a limited form of sparring. Personally, I think that one of the reasons that Modern Karate is so attractive to parents and kids is because this is what Itosu's intended to create. As a teacher, I think that he had an intuitive understanding of development so that he could really go about designing something that would be appropriate for children. Kara-te was inentionally watered down and made safe and this is what was passed on to most of us originally.
Taking this into account, here are my rudimentary thoughts on what the kids curriculum could look like. These thoughts are based off the Itosu model and, as of this moment, I'm trying to stick to the developmental appropriateness that he identified over 100 years ago.
I'm thinking about using the "traditional" 10 gup ranking system. Each rank would have one hyung associated with it. Each rank would have a series of techniques (basics) that would help the student perform the moves in the hyung. Also, each rank would have two Ill Soo Shik and Ho Sin Shul techniques associated with it. The Ill Soo Shik would contain stand up material (based off the hyung) that is developmentally appropriate for children and the Ho Sin shul would contain the same, but it would revolve around basic clinch and grappling skills. Lastly, I think I may also require a limited form of sparring, just so they can get the idea and have some fun competing against each other.
I know that this resembles the majority of Modern Karate based systems out there and I want to say that I'm not trying to be disrespectful when I say that this stuff is really just kids stuff. I am drawing off of historical sources though and I am drawing off of my own knowledge of education to make this assessment.
In the end, I think that this could be a successful class for children. Mainly, I think this because I feel that if follows Itosu Sensei's original intent in regards to the creation of Modern Karate.
What do you think?
1. The curriculum is extensive. There is a lot to remember and a lot to practice. Most kids don't have the discipline or the time to do this because they want to be in lots of other things too (little league, soccar, football, hockey, etc...).
2. The curriculum is full of techniques that are obviously dangerous. Joint locks, chokes, real strikes, falls and throws, etc...many parents don't want their children exposed to this type of stuff, for obvious reasons.
3. We spar realistically at all levels of engagement. I require contact when we spar and I require students to buy the proper safety equipment and since we work everything from grappling to stand-up there is quite a list that needs to be purchased. On top of this, our sparring looks hard.
4. No tournaments. I don't train students for competition. I don't have time and I don't have the will to do so. Although we incorporate some sporting aspects into our training, we just don't focus on that.
5. Advancement is slow. I tell students that the minimum time that you can earn your blackbelt, with no previous training, is five years. And this is only possible if you really dedicate yourself to training and spend lots of time practicing. On top of this, we only have four belts and the tests are usually 1 to 2 years apart.
I don't have anything against kids training. In fact, I like it when they do train at my dojang because I think they get a more realistic view of what the martial arts are supposed to be. Also, even though I've experimented with a separate curriculum in the past, I just didn't have time to teach both.
Some recent developments, however, may change this. One of them is that my wife is getting back into training and that she wants to be a martial arts role model for our daughter who is five. Another is that I have other students who have daughters who are a little to young to do what we are currently doing, but are still interested in the martial arts. The bottom line is that if I started this kids class, I could probably five to six girls right off the bat, including my daughter who is really showing interest in training. Time is no longer an excuse for me either as my wife has offered to teach this class.
With that being said, I have been pondering what I may want the kids curriculum to look like. My initial thoughts surrounded doing something along the lines of what most organizations do for their regular curriculum. They basically follow the model that Itosu Sensei created...line drills of basic techniques, sanitized kata, and a limited form of sparring. Personally, I think that one of the reasons that Modern Karate is so attractive to parents and kids is because this is what Itosu's intended to create. As a teacher, I think that he had an intuitive understanding of development so that he could really go about designing something that would be appropriate for children. Kara-te was inentionally watered down and made safe and this is what was passed on to most of us originally.
Taking this into account, here are my rudimentary thoughts on what the kids curriculum could look like. These thoughts are based off the Itosu model and, as of this moment, I'm trying to stick to the developmental appropriateness that he identified over 100 years ago.
I'm thinking about using the "traditional" 10 gup ranking system. Each rank would have one hyung associated with it. Each rank would have a series of techniques (basics) that would help the student perform the moves in the hyung. Also, each rank would have two Ill Soo Shik and Ho Sin Shul techniques associated with it. The Ill Soo Shik would contain stand up material (based off the hyung) that is developmentally appropriate for children and the Ho Sin shul would contain the same, but it would revolve around basic clinch and grappling skills. Lastly, I think I may also require a limited form of sparring, just so they can get the idea and have some fun competing against each other.
I know that this resembles the majority of Modern Karate based systems out there and I want to say that I'm not trying to be disrespectful when I say that this stuff is really just kids stuff. I am drawing off of historical sources though and I am drawing off of my own knowledge of education to make this assessment.
In the end, I think that this could be a successful class for children. Mainly, I think this because I feel that if follows Itosu Sensei's original intent in regards to the creation of Modern Karate.
What do you think?