Is this a hate crime?

Tom

Yellow Belt
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Location
On the road
Littering is a crime, isn't it?

One would hope that the participants would have read the encyclopedias. They might have gotten more out of it.
 
Encyclopedias? WTF? Is the price of oil driving up the cost of spray paint? I think the police are going to want to have a word with this guy.
 
If my understanding of a hate crime is correct then this falls under that category. I understand a crime to be any act, physical or psychological, towards someone based of gender, race, religion or sexual preference. This would be a psychological in my opinion.

B
 
Littering is a crime, vandalism is a crime, but I don't think that is a hate crime. What's next? Thought crime? I personally think the whole "hate crime" concept is absurd! Crime is crime! Just my opinion.
 
Littering is a crime, vandalism is a crime, but I don't think that is a hate crime. What's next? Thought crime? I personally think the whole "hate crime" concept is absurd! Crime is crime! Just my opinion.
I agree with you on the concept of "hate crime." I also have a problem with the concept of "hate speech." I agree with previous posters that a crime was committed.
 
I agree with you on the concept of "hate crime." I also have a problem with the concept of "hate speech." I agree with previous posters that a crime was committed.


Agreed. It was a psychological attack.
 
If Im correct, isnt a "Hate Crime" just a classification of a specific crime? For example, I spray paint your car its vandalism/criminal mischief which is a crime. If I spray paint it with racial slurs directed at you, its still criminal mischief, but because it was done based on race its now classified as a "hate crime" which can either result in a stiffer sentence locally, or turn it into a federal case.

If thats right, what is the crime committed here? If it was directed at a particular person it would be a harassment I would think, but if not I dont know....neo-nazis can walk around with them everywhere as protected speech, what is different here?
 
If Im correct, isnt a "Hate Crime" just a classification of a specific crime? For example, I spray paint your car its vandalism/criminal mischief which is a crime. If I spray paint it with racial slurs directed at you, its still criminal mischief, but because it was done based on race its now classified as a "hate crime" which can either result in a stiffer sentence locally, or turn it into a federal case.

If thats right, what is the crime committed here? If it was directed at a particular person it would be a harassment I would think, but if not I dont know....neo-nazis can walk around with them everywhere as protected speech, what is different here?
The difference here would be that the books were displayed in the shape of a symbol designed to scare/harrass/intimidate those who attended the temple. I think it would fall into the category of hate crime even though I'm with the group that believes a crime is a crime is a crime.
 
So it would be a harassment? I dont think you actually get charged with a "hate crime". Its a "crime" with a "hate motivation". But you still need a crime.
 
Books arranged in the form of a swastika in the parking lot of a synagogue? Yes, I'd say it's a hate crime.
 
Its clearly a case of intended threat or intimidation.

I want to know why it was done with encyclopaedia. Was someone walking down the street with an armload of books and just thought, "Ah a temple, I'll just try to intimidate them with these books." Or did they come from the temple itself? If that was so then there is a case of burglary involved.
 
Don't flame me for this, but I can't help but wonder: Are all of the people on this thread who are saying "hate crime = thought crime" or "a crime is a crime," white males? If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. I've just found through personal experience that it's far harder to "walk in another's shoes" than you realize.
 
Back
Top