Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am looking to take up a Karate system that is composed of the handwork of Boxing, the kicks of Kyokushin, and the throws and chokes of Judo/Jujitsu. Can anyone help a total noob identify which style(s) best match those criteria?
If the answer was a single best style, we'd all be doing it.
Greetings all,
I am looking to take up a Karate system that is composed of the handwork of Boxing, the kicks of Kyokushin, and the throws and chokes of Judo/Jujitsu. Can anyone help a total noob identify which style(s) best match those criteria?
Thanks !!
Hey guys, thanks for the warm welcome and the pointers. I am particulaly interested in the Daidojuku, however a couple of questions come to mind... first, does it allow standing chokes/submissions, and secondly, how would you rate it in terms of street effectiveness? Seems their focus is mainly on full-contact tournaments, so naturally I'm wondering if they encompass things like knife defense in their curriculum. Or does that also depend on the instructor?
Sorry, as far as my research has found, there are no Daido Juku Kudo schools in North America, anywhere. None in Canada, and None in the USA.
Just to second Terry's post, it really has to do with your instructors, and their interpretation of the karate toolkit (or that of any other MA, for that matter).
A couple of point occur to me.
If I were you, I'd visit a few karate dojos and KMA dojangs and see how they work. Consider Tang Soo Do and Hapkido schools in your calculations. Talk about just these things you've indicated are important to you with the school instructors. Really, there's no other way to do it...
- Karate itself has its own handwork which is every bit as devastating as boxing, if you train for close quarter combat the way boxers do. The resources are there in abundance—you might be interested in the story of Choki Motobu here. But you have to train close in techs very sincerely to be effective, and that's where boxers' training shines out: they accept that they are going toe-to-toe and will be in range of devastating punches. If karateka train with the same expectations, they can be at least as effective.
- Karate's kicks differ from those of the KMAs in several respects; unlike TKD's, for example, there seems to be little emphasis on very high power open-hip strikes intended to damage the attacker enough to take them out of the fight. But those kicks are (in the minds of a lot of KMAists, anyway) most effective when delivered low, where karate's kicks tend to be aimed just as a matter of course. A compromise might be to study Tang Soo Do with an instructor interested in realistic applications to street defense; TSD has a full range of effective Korean-style kicking weapons, but also emphasizes hand techs in a big way, and along lines familiar to karateka. TKD also has those techs, but few dojangs train them to the same degree; I'm lucky to be in one that does. Again, it's the instructor who is going to determine how all this plays out.
- Karate has plenty of grappling techs (take a look at Iain Abernethy's Karate's Grappling Methods and Throws for Strikers: the Forgotten Throws of Karate, Boxing and Taekwondo if you need any convincing). A lot of the early karate pioneers, such as Funakoshi and Egami, were quite upfront about this. Those techs linger on in the thinking of Okinawan teachers probably more than in most of the Japanese styles, but Abernethy does Japanese karate, so clearly at least some devotees of those styles are aware of what's there along those line (though the application is more to set up finishing strikes, as a rule, than to use the locks, pins and throws themselves to finish the fight, as I understand it). But again, clearly, it's the instructor who makes the difference.