I've watched a number of these episodes and , overall, I think we need to cut them ( the History Channel/ Human Weapon) some slack. When the dust settles and the air clears , I am not dissapointed with the program on silat.....in fact, I liked it . But to like it, one needs to keep things in proper perspective.
Sure ,I get tired of the questionable statements..."This is the only systems that uses....( fill in the blank) " and other superlatives , as well as the notion that these two guys can come in ( probably with some preconcieved notions and established "worldviews " on combat) and in a week get a real handle on the essence of an art and get some sort of "mastery" ....followed by a challenge to someone who has years in the art. I'm sure they can't just be "blown off the mat"....this would not look good for the hosts. They ( the hosts) may say some goofy things but I don't think it is meant with disrespect to the martial arts community and I think I have not seen them act disdainful to any system. From an Indo -Malay perspective they could seem arrogant .I think they could appeal to to Western viewers in that they ( especially Bill Duff ) seem to walk in with a bit of typical Western skepticism and confidence in his own strength and size.....and then seems to often have his "eyes opened" a bit by his training experiences. I think this makes an acceptable impression on the casual viewer.
I train silat and , knowing how many Guru -guru are, I'd doubt they would give their best and most profound teachings to outsiders with some money for a TV show to be aired in front of thousands of people they know nothing about. I expected the techniques to be simple with easily learned movements....no special "state secrets " being revealed. The fight against 6 pesilat was so staged that it was clearly "repetitive demonstration only", rather than a real , unrehearsed silat vs mass attack scenario. So, yes , in that regard , it was disappointing. They made favorable and complimentary remarks regarding silat , which someone like me ( a silat player)would obviously like. They did touch on some of the characteristic features of silat , but they did not stress/ emphasize them, making them easily missed by anyone not hanging on their every word. The problem here is , we ,as martial artists ,are wanting a martial arts program FOR martial artists. In this, case we want a silat program for silat people. We want to see the hosts and viewers being taken through all the deep , esoteric teachings of these arts, we want to see them being taught special techniques that are more closely held and we want a very thorough ,analytical dissection of what makes this art different and valuable compared to others. This program is just not able to do that within its basic premise and the time constraints. A Pendekar of a silat system is not going to show all that to an outsider anyway....and we all know this!
The program is designed to fascinate and "hook" the casual History Channel viewer who may know NOTHING of ANY martial art let alone our/ your favorite "pet" martial art. Obviously, the goal is to get these guys ready for a "sparring session" that can be shown to an audience. The Channel probably things a "ring style" or "MMA style" sparring session is what the general public wants to see. This is ,in itself , limiting. Some things just don't translate to the "ring sparring" session , which is the climactic feature of the program . Obviously ,weapon work may be outside the scope of the program or be deemed unsuitable ..or less suitable for public consumption. The Escrima style stick fighting may have been okay, but a sparring session with knives/ keris/ karambit might be considered "too violent" for the general audience. Some training is just not astounding and exciting to the TV viewer as well. There is not enough time to get into the subtle developmental changes and discoveries found with prolonged training in an art like Silat either. Being intimately involved with martial arts , we can always come up with ways to "do it better " I think.
The presentation/ program is confined to one hour. I am sure they have to limit what they show and I think a lot gets edited out for one reason or another. This really limits what can be shown....anything that is "boring" or too far off track is most likely discarded.
I think the computer animation and explaination of the techniques are some sort of "nod" to those who want to "learn something " by watching the program. It seems everything ever shown is absolutely elementary , if you have any time in the arts. However, we have to remember the program essentially targets the non-martial artists: all those folks from the outside looking in to the "world of martial arts"....those who have heard of only one or two arts and, perhaps have no knowledge of anything being out there other than karate or judo.....those who know nothing of the arts and find this program an interesting and entertaining chance to learn something.....those who do not train but might use this as a way to decide what they might , someday , want to train in.
If ,as the old adage goes, "there is no such thing as bad press" , this program , for all it's shortcomings ( from a trained martial artist's perspective) is still "our" best ally in stirring up interest in martial arts . It does not show the arts to be full of sociopaths ... it touches on history... it shows intelligent,patient ,giving instructors and friendly, helpful students .... it shows gentlemanly and polite conduct even in context of the "challenges"...it shows challenging , daunting training regimens that can still be survived albeit with pained smiles......all positive reflections on "our world". Every week , we have a program that comes on discussing "martial arts" and in a circuitous way, promoting the arts. It is , essentially , a FREE "martial arts awareness" program and advertisement for the world of martial arts....broadcast nationally and internationally.
I don't think we need to protest too bitterly.
With Respect,
Doc D