Good grief...it isn't about me or my opinion at all! It has everything to do with MODERN society, and how it still falls short in several ways.
Personally, I think that the Selective Service Act is archaic, and *should* allow able-bodied women to be drafted. It's not like ALL men between the ages 18-45 are physically capable of ground fighting. I also think that women *should* be allowed to fight in the infantry. And I know there are many women who would be ready and willing to fight in the trenches, if called upon.
Same reason why there are AGE catagories in most MA tourneys and other sporting events. Remember the big Little League World Series scandal a few years ago? One of the pitchers was a 14-year-old, and he was pitted against a bunch of kids who were 12 and under. Not a very fair matchup, don't you think?
Don't you know how LIMITED maternity leave is nowadays? Most mothers wind up returning to work after just about a month or two. And it's not like most employers actually allot special time off for mothers. Most of them wind up using a combination of short-term disability and sick leave. Which is what a physically incapacitated male worker would use.
Check out this site for more info on maternity leave: http://www.babycenter.com/refcap/pregnancy/pregnantatwork/449.html
Whether a woman can be drafted or not, separate gender competitions, and maternity leave are irrelevant to the topic of a woman being elected as president. But with all honesty, attitudes like the one you displayed on this thread certainly don't help matters any.
beau_safken said:1) Selective service...Why can't woman 18-25 be signed up as that would double the ranks in time of need.
Personally, I think that the Selective Service Act is archaic, and *should* allow able-bodied women to be drafted. It's not like ALL men between the ages 18-45 are physically capable of ground fighting. I also think that women *should* be allowed to fight in the infantry. And I know there are many women who would be ready and willing to fight in the trenches, if called upon.
beau_safken said:2) Why are there woman/men divisions in olympic sports, martial arts tourneys, and other sport events? Shouldn't it be one division?
Same reason why there are AGE catagories in most MA tourneys and other sporting events. Remember the big Little League World Series scandal a few years ago? One of the pitchers was a 14-year-old, and he was pitted against a bunch of kids who were 12 and under. Not a very fair matchup, don't you think?
beau_safken said:3) Maturnity leave, woman choose to be pregnent so why should everyone else have to pay for that choice at work? Should men get a like break for a chosen ailment, problem or the like?
Don't you know how LIMITED maternity leave is nowadays? Most mothers wind up returning to work after just about a month or two. And it's not like most employers actually allot special time off for mothers. Most of them wind up using a combination of short-term disability and sick leave. Which is what a physically incapacitated male worker would use.
Check out this site for more info on maternity leave: http://www.babycenter.com/refcap/pregnancy/pregnantatwork/449.html
beau_safken said:Are the above fair and equal? As for woman in Office, I'd love to see one make it all the way to being elected. The honest answer is it will be a very tall order to make that happen in our country, complain to me about being unfair or whatever...that's life atm.
Whether a woman can be drafted or not, separate gender competitions, and maternity leave are irrelevant to the topic of a woman being elected as president. But with all honesty, attitudes like the one you displayed on this thread certainly don't help matters any.