oftheherd1
Senior Master
- Joined
- May 12, 2011
- Messages
- 4,685
- Reaction score
- 817
Well, a little bit of everything actually. The biggest reason I would say is for my own historical curiosity. Choi Yong Sul learned Daito Ryu Aikijujutsu in Japan for decades. He comes back to his native Korea teaching what he learned. All the accounts that I've read about GM Choi is that his Hapkido was very brutal and straight forward. I read one story that stated that when Sokaku Takeda wanted to shame a student who was a little to 'full of themselves', he would have Choi spar with his class mate. Choi was said to have been very good at sparring. And of course he would defeat his opponent. The shame came not so much from the defeat, but rather a Japanese being defeated by a Korean.
Anyway, I would imagine that Choi's version Daito ryu would differ greatly because I get the sense that he may have sparred alot, shaping the way he did techniques differently from how he was taught through trial and error in sparring matches. Possibly creating something very effective and straight forward that we see some Hapkido styles today. This is just a theory, but one I think is worth looking into.
Also, I would think that Daito ryu Aikijujutsu may have changed since the passing of Sokaku Takeda. But I have no proof to really go on this one either. But, GM Choi's Hapkido may be more closer to what Takeda taught than what is being taught as Daito ryu today. As far as I can tell, Aikido and Aikijujutsu are looking more and more alike.
Also there are Hapkido techniques that I am trying to master, and by studying the source art (Daito ryu) I can get a better idea of how the techniques are done in Japan, and how they differ in Hapkido, and maybe figure out why the techniques changed here and there as well as learn different ways of doing the same technique. Of course, I understand that techniques vary teacher to teacher, but some techniques remain the same regardless of Hapkido style.
I would to mention as well, I would like to learn the Japanese names to the same techniques found in Hapkido as most Hapkido styles don't have names for many of their techniques. I learn better by names or giving techniques names rather than saying ' here is technique #1, now here is #2,..' and so on.
But, anyway, it all about learning, and growing as a martial artist. Also, honoring the memory of GM Choi and the other marital art giants from that time period. I want to preserve history as well as do research into Hapkido's roots that wouldn't just benefit myself, but anyone who would be interested. I appreciate all the comments and thoughts so far.
My 'research' is hopefully received in good spirit for which it is intended.
- Brian (or Doom)
Concerning bolded portions:
FWIW I think you will find Hapkido is brutal in that it doesn't seek to avoid harming the opponent, in fact, generally the opposite. At least the Hapkido I learned is that way. Sort of 'I didn't want to do this to begin with, and I don't want to do it again'.
If you want to study DaiIto Ryu, that is you business. But from my experience, that is not necessary for the learning of Hapkido. Nor would I think, learning any other MA that may have ancestry from another identifiable MA. A MA being taught, should stand well on its own teaching. I would think it more likely that you would either confuse yourself, or slow yourself down unnecessarily. You don't mention, but are you studying Hapkido formally, or just trying to grab a technique here and there?
In the Hapkido I studied, on a military installation, time was preceious. My GM had long ago gone to using English rather than trying to teach Korean as well as Hapkido. However, it followed the Korean example of Yellow Belt Punch Block #1, Blue Belt Kick Block #5, etc. Perhaps if you substitute such a description it will be easier for you. If there are Hapkido schools that only use numbers, I guess it is that teacher's choice to do. I actually know very little about other Hapkido schools, as I only studied under my GM. It would seem strange to try to do it any other way than what I mentioned.
As a further comment, if you are indeed only trying to grab a technique here and there, I sure wouldn't stress too much over it. Learn it and move on. Why worry about where it came from outside of Hapkido if you aren't a serious student of Hapkido. If you are a serious student of Hapkido, ask your teacher. But learn what your teacher teaches about the techniques, no matter where they may have originated from. Many MA have borrowed things that seemed very useful from other MA (and why not), starting back from a very long time ago.