http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17066353/
in this article, a man in holland wants to be jailed for eating chocolate- he's seeking a sentence so he can bring awareness to the chocolate industry's purchasing of cocoa beans from the ivory coast which is acussed of using child slave labor.
shouldn't we not by this logic be held accountable for our indulgences in drinking coffee, the gas we put in our cars, in every purchase of some cheap walmart appliance, even the clothes we buy from almost every major brand?
is it not apparent that we live in a world (the Western world to be specific) where the things we buy and pleasures we enjoy are not in some part provided by the poverty and corruption of third world nations?
child labor, near servitude conditions for adults, pennies daily pay, no med, no protection etc.. it all contributes to the low costs of products that we buy daily.
we may critizise the corporations that exploit labor and natural resources-- but they don't exist without demand for the products they provide. and the demand is ever there and rarely anyone complains (unless you're a smarmy tv host like kathy lee gifford-- then we can have outrage).
my basic question-- is there anyway to live in our world and not contribute to the crimes of our lifestyles?
in this article, a man in holland wants to be jailed for eating chocolate- he's seeking a sentence so he can bring awareness to the chocolate industry's purchasing of cocoa beans from the ivory coast which is acussed of using child slave labor.
shouldn't we not by this logic be held accountable for our indulgences in drinking coffee, the gas we put in our cars, in every purchase of some cheap walmart appliance, even the clothes we buy from almost every major brand?
is it not apparent that we live in a world (the Western world to be specific) where the things we buy and pleasures we enjoy are not in some part provided by the poverty and corruption of third world nations?
child labor, near servitude conditions for adults, pennies daily pay, no med, no protection etc.. it all contributes to the low costs of products that we buy daily.
we may critizise the corporations that exploit labor and natural resources-- but they don't exist without demand for the products they provide. and the demand is ever there and rarely anyone complains (unless you're a smarmy tv host like kathy lee gifford-- then we can have outrage).
my basic question-- is there anyway to live in our world and not contribute to the crimes of our lifestyles?