framing - how word choice changes meaning

[raedyn]

An interesting article discussing how language can be manipulated for political uses.

Example:
When talking about the government that George Bush heads up, it's called the Bush Administration.
When talking about the government that Saddam Hussien headed up, it's called Saddam's Regime.
See how the connotations of 'administration' vs 'regime' change how each government is percieved? The repeated use of words with a deliberately negative or positive connotation creates associations in your mind - associations that tend to stick.

It's explained MUCH better in the article, and there probably are people on here who can go into more detail. I think this is fascinating. What other examples have you encountered? Do you think Joe Public is conscious of these manipulations? Do you get sucked in? Is there a way to help yourself be conscious of when this is happening and to counteract it when you would prefer to?

 

[getgoin]

cool article

 

[Shizen Shigoku]

I recommend doing a search on memes and memetics. I'm sure you'll find related info.

 

[punisher73]

I have noticed that and talked about it alot. I took a class in college (can't remember the name of it right now) that was on the English language and using it in speeches, ads and so on.

Some other examples "he claimed" vs. "he stated"
"planned" vs. "plotted"

Those are the main two I can remember right now from watching the media during this election.

 

[Feisty Mouse]

framing is a really interesting attitude-shaping device.

I participated in a meeting about scientists talking to people about global climate change, and framing discussions came up - I was fascinated. In just changing how you approached the topic, people are likely to be much more (or less) receptive to listening to you.

 

[Cruentus]

And that, my firends, is how rich theives have been stealing elections in recent years.

Paul