Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I read of this when I studied USSR history. and then people who had grown up with Stalin were exposed to some of the truths about him via Khrushchev and it was a real shock. and many of them even today a lot of the Russian people still think of stalin positively.
It is easy to see how people who believe something, exposed to something else, wouldnt change their views. I dont think they're stupid. I see how it woulednt be easy for them to accept.
Besides, what are fact anyway?
Funny how it's always THEM..or THOSE people who are stupid, misinformed, etc.
Humans today have many epistemic virtues. We are clever animals who
have discovered a vast division of labor, enabling our unprecedented and
rapidly increasing power and understanding of science, industry, and more.
But we also have many epistemic vices, such as using our knowledge to
enable cruelty.
In particular, we often choose beliefs that are not the closest feasible
approximation to the truth. By this I do not mean that we fail to spend
all possible resources on obtaining or analyzing information. Instead, I
mean that our beliefs are biased because we have motivations other than
that of approximating truth while conserving resources (Mele, 2001). For
example, because we like to think well of ourselves and our groups, we
tend to overestimate our abilities and morality, exaggerate our influence,
and take credit for our successes while blaming external factors for our
failures (Giannetti, 1997).
This happens when people agree on what the answers would be in each imaginable world, but argue over which of these imaginable worlds is the real world. This theory can thus apply to disputes about facts that are specific or general, hard or easy to verify. It can cover the age of a car, the correctness of quantum mechanics, whether God created the universe, and which political candidate is more likely to induce prosperity. It can even apply to morality, when people believe there are objectively correct answers to moral questions.
Video game addiction, or more broadly video game overuse, is excessive or compulsive use of computer and video games that interferes with daily life. Instances have been reported in which users play compulsively, isolating themselves from, or from other forms of, social contact and focusing almost entirely on in-game achievements rather than broader life events.
Psychologists who see pornography as addictive may consider online, often Internet, pornography more addictive than ordinary pornography because of its wide availability, explicit nature, and the privacy that online viewing offers. Some claim that "addicts" regularly spend extended periods of time searching the internet for new or increasingly hardcore pornography.
...defines workaholism by signposts and characteristics, as both a substance addiction (to adrenaline and other stress hormones) and as a process addiction (to compulsively doing or avoiding work). WA further defines compulsive working as a progressive, addictive illness...
Funny how it's always THEM..or THOSE people who are stupid, misinformed, etc.
It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things